SU0012885 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

aa � The maximum development of 11 units would generate approximately one-third of the average daily trips generated by the proposed project. This alternative would not have a significant impact on the local traffic network. The addition of 11 units with a projected resident population of 31 persons would increase the demand for services, including law enforcement, fire, schools, and solid waste. The expected increase in demand from this alternative in itself would not significantly impact the agencies providing these services. This alternative would likely utilize private on-site wells, storm drainage systems and septic tanks. No significant impacts to the water supply or water quality are expected to occur with this alternative because large lot sizes would allow for maximum setbacks of the stormwater retention ponds and water wells . Specific impacts associated with use of individual septic and leachfield systems for wastewater disposal would be dependent on soil conditions as they are for the proposed project . . , Although this alternative J would consist of 5- to 10-acre - parcels it would a so genera e 68R@ i F8 F9 rwr.a} PA-Si 4 p p t ka; a$e-e wo u i d --—fie- e x t e n dem r u r a-1 e:sidgntial use southeast into agricu3tural lands t e e providing. _ the _im etas for future Viand use conversions. These impacts are discussed in further detail in Section V of this DEIR . C. SERVICES ALTERNATIVE [ � This alternative assumes development of the proposed project �J as described in Section II of this EIR . However, this alternative proposes a community water supply system and a public storm drainage system as opposed to private wells and individual storm water retention ponds . The use of a packaged treatment plant for the entire subdivision is also discussed under this alternative in the event soil conditions do not permit the use of either leachfields or seepage pits for sewage disposal . With this alternative impacts associated with land use, traffic and services (firer law enforcement, solid waste and schools) would essentially be the same as those discussed for the �1 proposed project in Sections IV and V of this EIR. flJl Provision of a community water supply system and a public storm drainage system as proposed for this alternative would be consistent with new County Development Policies requiring such systems for rural residential developments with lots under 2 acres. The specific policies affecting rural residential lots under two acres are discussed in Section IV, Land Use and Planning Policy. County development policies would require the formation of a County Service Area or similar district prior to approval of 68