My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011739
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544801
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011739
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011739
RECORD_ID
PR0544801
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003210
FACILITY_NAME
TEXACO TRUCK STOP
STREET_NUMBER
7500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95378
APN
25015018
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7500 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
---------------- <br /> Site Characterization Report: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. Page 22 <br /> 5.0 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL AND GROUNDWATER <br /> By synthesizing the historic, geologic, hydrostratigraphic and geo-chemical data gathered <br /> by the work performed for the site characterization program, together with information <br /> obtained by Dietz Irrigation at the time the underground storage tanks and piping were <br /> removed from the 7500 West Eleventh Street property, SJC has developed an <br /> �_J interpretation of the sources by which, and the distribution and lateral and vertical extent <br /> to which the subsurface beneath the subject property and adjacent areas has been affected <br /> by petroleum hydrocarbons. This interpretation and the parameters upon which it is based <br /> are discussed in the following sections of this report. <br /> Note: Analyses performed on selected samples of soil and groundwater also included <br /> analysis for total lead in soil and groundwater. The sampling locations and the results of <br /> _ those analyses are included in Tables 1 and 2. However, in those cases where lead was <br /> detectable, its concentration was well within the range that is known to occur naturally in <br /> the alluvial deposits on which the subject property is located. (The San Joaquin Company <br /> .3 Inc. 2000.) Also, we note that no EDB or 1,2-DCA were detected in any samples of <br /> groundwater that were analyzed. <br /> 5.1. Tank Pit No. 1 <br /> As was noted in Section 2.1, when the underground storage tanks that had served the <br /> fueling station in the years prior to its final closure were removed from Tank Pit No. 1, <br /> they were in excellent condition and free of rust. There was no evidence that either the <br /> tanks or their adjacent piping had leaked or that there had been any significant release of <br /> fueldue to over-filling of the tanks. <br /> I_�1 <br /> Four soil samples recovered from the walls of Tank Pit No. 1 at the depth of the surface <br /> of the groundwater contained, as can be seen in Table 1, no detectable concentrations of <br /> gasoline, although MTBE was present in all four samples at very low concentrations. <br /> Three of the samples contained low concentrations of one or more of the BTEX <br /> compounds. Diesel at a concentration of 2,200 mg/Kg was detected in a soil sample <br /> recovered from the west wall at groundwater level in the southwest corner of the pit. <br /> Diesel in the three other samples contained either no detectable concentrations of diesel <br /> or very low concentrations of that fuel. The sampling locations referred to above are <br /> shown on Figure 4. <br /> i As was also discussed in Section 2.1, when the tanks from Tank Pit No. 1 were removed, <br /> ':_J floating product flowed in from the western wall of the pit. That floating product was <br /> skimmed from the water surface until there was no further inflow, and the tank pit was <br /> free of floating product. Significantly, although a grab sample of groundwater taken from <br /> the pit at that time contained 210,000 µg/L of diesel, it also contained 55,000 µg/L of <br /> gasoline, which would be incompatible with the fact that no detectable concentrations of <br /> gasoline were detected in samples recovered from the walls of the pit at the depth of the <br /> water table, unless the source of the floating product that flowed into Tank Pit No. 1 was <br /> located at some point remote from and to the west of the pit. <br /> sic <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.