My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011743
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544801
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011743
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:58:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011743
RECORD_ID
PR0544801
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003210
FACILITY_NAME
TEXACO TRUCK STOP
STREET_NUMBER
7500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95378
APN
25015018
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7500 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Extended Site Characierization Report: 7500 West Elevenih Street, Tracy, CA. Page 18 <br /> When full, the drums were closed, transported from the well sites and placed in storage <br /> on the 7500 West Eleventh Street property until the results of analyses of soil and water <br /> samples were available. When the analytical results were obtained, the soil in the drums <br /> was classified and, if clean, disposed as clean fill on the 7500 West Eleventh Street <br /> property. Soil affected by components of fuel hydrocarbons was loaded into a truck and <br /> shipped for disposal at Forward Landfill, a Class 11 disposal facility in Manteca, <br /> I ' California. See disposal records in Appendix C. <br /> - , 5.8 Well Development <br /> { On April 4th and 5th, 2002, the wells were developed by pumping and surging and by <br /> bailing a minimum of 10 well volumes from each. The development water was staged on- <br /> site in 55-gal. closed-top steel drums. <br /> When data was available on the concentrations of analytes of concern in samples <br /> recovered from the newly-installed groundwater-quality monitoring wells, drums that <br /> contained clean water were emptied by decanting them onto a paved and drained surface <br /> on the site. Purge water that was found to be affected by hydrocarbons was decanted into <br /> a 1,000-gal. storage tank on the property, where it will be held until sufficient water has <br /> accumulated from future groundwater sampling activities to permit its economical <br /> disposal at a permitted treatment facility. <br /> i` <br /> 5.9 Computation of Groundwater Elevations <br /> On April 11, 2002, one week following well development, the depth from the top of the <br /> casing to the water table was measured using a conductivity meter in each pre-existing <br /> and newly-installed well as part of the planned extended site characterization program. <br /> That data was used to compute the groundwater table elevations relative to MSL. The <br /> measurements and computed elevations are presented in Table 2. <br /> -. 5.10 Well Purging <br /> After the depths to groundwater were measured, a small-diameter, submersible pump was <br /> used to purge each groundwater-quality monitoring well of stagnant water. The pumped <br /> water was discharged into 5-gal, pails, each of which was, in tarn, discharged into an <br /> open-topped, 55-gallon drum equipped with a securable lid. When the drum was full, it <br /> 'j was transported to the 7500 West Eleventh Street property and decanted into a 1,000-gal. <br /> storage tank that had been placed on the site for the purpose of storing well development <br /> and purge water so that sufficient quantity can be accumulated for it to be economically <br /> disposed. <br /> During the purging procedure, the temperature, electrical conductivity and pH of the <br /> stream of purge water was monitored by periodically checking those parameters using a <br /> multi-function electronic meter. Purging continued until all three parameters stabilized, <br /> (i.e., variations between measurements were less than 10%) or, in the case of wells <br /> screened above the water table, until a minimum of 15 gallons of groundwater had been <br /> sic <br /> i � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.