Laserfiche WebLink
r� <br /> Report;Groundwater-qualityMonitoring—July 29,2002: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA, Page b <br /> �a <br /> �(. 2.0 JULY 29, 2002 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> i <br /> On July 29, 2002, the seventh round of groundwater-quality monitoring was conducted. <br /> Monitoring Wells MW-1 through MW-3, MW-3A, MW-313, MW-4 through MW-12 and <br /> MW-12A, at the locations shown on Figure 2 were sampled. <br /> r , <br /> 2.1. Groundwater Elevations and Flow Direction <br /> To initiate the July 29, 2002 sampling program, the depth to groundwater in each of the <br /> fifteen monitoring wells was measured using a conductivity probe. The water table <br /> elevations were computed relative to mean sea level (MSL). Those measurements and the <br /> computed groundwater table elevations are recorded in Table 1, <br /> In the period between April 11, 200, the date on which the depths to groundwater in the <br /> monitoring wells were last measured, and July 29, 2002, the groundwater table had risen, <br /> on average, 0.9 ft. However, the rise in the water table was not uniform over the whole of <br /> the area monitored. Groundwater rose more that 1 ft. in the monitoring wells along and to <br /> the south of West Eleventh Street, but it rose no more than 0.62 ft. in the northern area of <br /> the primary plume of affected groundwater <br /> It is noteworthy that the elevation of the groundwater table rose over the period April 11 <br /> to July 29, 2002 even though no precipitation fell anywhere in the Sa Joaquin Valley <br /> during that time. Such changes in groundwater elevation unrelated to weather conditions <br /> are commonly seen in the Tracy area and are caused by importation of large volumes of <br /> water to the area via the Delta-Mendota canal and by water from deep agricultural wells <br /> being discharged to shallow aquifers in the seasons when crops require irrigation. <br /> The groundwater elevations presented in Table 1 were used to generate the groundwater <br /> contours shown on Figure 2. However, because, as is noted in Table 2, an apparent 0,18 <br /> f ft of floating product was detected in Monitoring Well MW-7, the groundwater elevation <br /> in that well was corrected for the purpose of drawing the groundwater contours to allow <br /> for the depression of the water table in the vicinity of that well by the hydrocarbon fuel <br /> !: I products floating on the surface of the water. The correction was derived as follows: <br /> Assume Specific Gravity of Diesel=0.84 <br /> r 1 <br /> Assume Specific Gravity of Gasoline= 0.74 <br /> Assume relative proportions of diesel and gasoline in the floating product in Monitoring <br /> Well MW-7 are in the same ratio as the concentrations of diesel and gasoline in the <br /> sample of groundwater recovered from that well on December 13, 2001. They were, <br /> respectively, 800,000 gg/L and 61,000 gg/L. (See Table 2.) <br /> Thus, the estimated specific gravity of the floating product in well MW-7 is: <br /> } pp = 0.83 <br /> sic <br /> I <br />