My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011751
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544801
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011751
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 11:03:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011751
RECORD_ID
PR0544801
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003210
FACILITY_NAME
TEXACO TRUCK STOP
STREET_NUMBER
7500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95378
APN
25015018
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7500 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•� Work Plan for Refined Plume Definition and Management of Floating Product-7500 W ll ih St.. Tracy, CA. Page 12 <br /> ,r 5.0 DOWN-GRADIENT MIGRATION OF FLOATING PRODUCT <br /> SJC suspected the incipient arrival of LNAPL or "floating product" to water in Monitoring <br /> ... Well MW-7 from the results of the November 28, 2000 groundwater-quality monitoring <br /> round (The San Joaquin Company 2001£), due to the high concentrations of diesel and <br /> gasoline detected in the sample recovered from that well at that time. By September 11, <br /> �. 2001, the concentrations of both gasoline and diesel in groundwater in MW-7 exceeded the <br /> saturation concentrations for those fuels. When a measurement was made on April 11, 2002, <br /> the apparent thickness of LNAPL floating on the groundwater had reached 0.30 ft. Since that <br /> -- time, as is recorded in Table 3, floating product has continued to be present in that well <br /> through the latest round of groundwater-quality monitoring that was conducted on October <br /> 27, 2003, when it was measured to have an apparent thickness of 0.55 ft. <br /> Note: <br /> As is discussed in Section 9.2, floating product is being purged from <br /> Monitoring Well MW-7 on a quarterly schedule. After three rounds of <br /> purging on a weekly schedule, the first of which was performed on <br /> November 8, 2003, and one purging on a monthly schedule, the <br /> groundwater in that boring is currently essentially free of floating product. <br /> However, for the reasons discussed in this work plan, SJC does not believe <br /> that the area of the subsurface in the area around MW-7 is free of floating <br /> product. <br /> .�. 5.1 Initial Proposals for Removal of Floating Product <br /> Following discovery of the presence of significant thicknesses of floating product in <br /> Monitoring Well MW-7, SJC's engineers communicated their concern about its presence to <br /> SJCEHD staff. At that time, SJC recommended that action be taken to remove LNAPL from <br /> the subsurface in an extended area (Watkins 2002), Based on their extensive experience with <br /> w. management of floating product at fuel hydrocarbon release sites, SJC's engineers proposed <br /> that the LNAPL be removed by excavating trenches normal to the axis of the affected plume <br /> along the north side of West Eleventh Street so that the anticipated large volumes of floating <br /> product present in the area could be efficiently extracted from the subsurface by transfer into <br /> vacuum trucks for transport to and disposal at a permitted treatment and recycling facility. <br /> From conversations with SJCEHD's staff in 2000, SJC learned of that Agency's concern <br /> about the proposed method for removing floating product from the north side of West <br /> 4 Eleventh Street. Understanding that these concerns were based on that Agency's Iack of <br /> previous experience with the proposed technology and fears about its assumed high cost of <br /> implementation and its technical and economical feasibility, with the objective of providing a <br /> more complete technical explanation of the proposed remediation and, in the context of the <br /> cooperative approach between consulting engineers and regulatory personnel that has been <br /> advocated by the USEAP in its guidance documents (United States Environmental Protection <br /> ,.. Agency 1997), SJC requested a meeting with SJCEHS senior staff. The meeting was held on <br /> July 22, 2002, but following a limited technical discussion, SJCEHD's representative stated <br /> SJC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.