My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011751
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544801
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011751
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 11:03:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011751
RECORD_ID
PR0544801
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003210
FACILITY_NAME
TEXACO TRUCK STOP
STREET_NUMBER
7500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95378
APN
25015018
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7500 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Work Plan for Refined Plume Definition and Management of Floating Product-7500 W 11th St., Tracy, CA, Page 43 <br /> will be ineffective in evacuating LNAPL from any significant distance around the point of <br /> extraction. These representative elementary volume effects are, of course, present at several <br /> scales. For example, at one scale, the representative elementary volume would have <br /> -- dimensions on the order of the distance between thin zones of permeable silt contained <br /> within a clay layer. On another scale, estimating the size of the representative elementary <br /> volume would involve consideration of the typical distance separating the substrata within <br /> �- the sequential system of clay and sandy materials that are present in the subsurface. <br /> Clearly, it is not, in practice, possible to accurately quantify the size of the representative <br /> elementary volume for any given geotechnical application. However, for the purposes of <br /> designing a floating product extraction system, it is readily apparent that, at the Navarra Site, <br /> the representative elementary volume has dimensions on the order of several feet. LNAPL <br /> extraction systems that are designed around small-diameter borings or similarly small-scale <br /> elements will not intersect a sufficient number of the zones of relatively high permeability <br /> that are contained within the mass of soil for the extraction system to operate effectively over <br /> lateral and vertical distances of that size. <br /> 9.3.3 Well Diameter Excavation Dimensions and Construction Method Considerations <br /> a <br /> In addition to the scale effects related to the heterogeneous nature of soil discussed above, <br /> there are also scale effects related to the hydraulics of flow to a well or other excavation. The <br /> effects of construction techniques on the performance of well in the context of its efficiency <br /> as an element of an LNAPL-removal system compared to the efficiency of an excavated <br /> trench or pit used for that purpose must also be considered. These hydraulic issues are <br /> discussed below. <br /> 9.3.3.1 Influence of Well or Excavation Size on Effectiveness of Extraction Systems <br /> When designing LNAPL extraction systems, it is useful to consider the effects of well <br /> diameter or, as applicable, excavation size on the ability of the system to capture <br /> contaminated liquids from a wide area within a plume of affected groundwater. The influence <br /> of well or excavation size on the effectiveness of extraction systems can be illustrated by <br /> consideration of the equilibrium well equation for extraction of groundwater from a well that <br /> penetrates completely through a confined aquifer (Slichter 1899, Turneaure and Russell <br /> 1901, Thiem 1906). That equation can be stated as: <br /> Q=(Kb [H-h])/(528 log R/r) Equation 2 <br /> Where: <br /> Q W well yield or pumping rate, in gpm <br /> K = hydraulic conductivity of the water-bearing formation, in gpd/fl <br /> H = static head measured from bottom of aquifer, in ft <br /> H w depth of water in the well while pumping, in ft. <br /> SJC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.