My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011751
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544801
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011751
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 11:03:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011751
RECORD_ID
PR0544801
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003210
FACILITY_NAME
TEXACO TRUCK STOP
STREET_NUMBER
7500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95378
APN
25015018
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7500 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Work Plan for Refined Plume Definition and Management of Floating Product-7500 W 11th St., Tracy, CA. Page 47 <br /> 9.4 Floating Product Remediation Technologies Considered <br /> In preparing this work plan, SJC considered three alternate technologies for remediation of <br /> floating product that is known to be present in an area around Monitoring Well MW-7, <br /> which, as is shown of Figure 4, is located on the northern shoulder of West Eleventh Street <br /> +� across from the 7500 West Eleventh Street property, close to the intersection of that highway <br /> iy with Chrisman Road. <br /> p In evaluating the alternate approaches for removal of LNAPL from the water table (in <br /> addition to the design issues. detailed in Section 9.3), SJC has considered their technical <br /> effectiveness, their capital cost and the estimated total operating cost from the time of <br /> installation until all floating product has been successfully removed. In each case, the <br /> advantages and disadvantages of the technology have been considered in the context of the <br /> > estimated distribution and total recoverable volume of LNAPL that must be removed from <br /> the subsurface. As discussed in Section 5.0, although it is difficult to make a quantitative <br /> estimate of that volume, the site characterization and groundwater-quality monitoring <br /> A programs completed to date indicate that it is on the order of several thousand gallons. <br /> L The three technologies considered are described in Sections 9.4.1 9.4.2 and 9.4.3 below. <br /> 1� , <br /> Note: <br /> In each case, a preliminary design for implementation of the technology at the <br /> 7500 West Eleventh site has been developed. Those designs are sufficient for <br /> proof of concept purposes and preparation of engineer's cost estimates. However, <br /> they are not final designs.A final design of the technology selected for installation <br /> will be undertaken after initial data from the floating-product monitoring wells <br /> described in Section 8.0 is available. Final designs of the subsurface portions of <br /> the systems, such as the locations of extraction wells or the dimensions of cut-off <br /> trenches, will be adapted to meet site-specific conditions as revealed by synthesis <br /> of all data available at the time they are installed, including criteria derived by <br /> application of the Observational Method(Peck 1969). <br /> w <br /> SJC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.