My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011752
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544801
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011752
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:08 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 11:04:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011752
RECORD_ID
PR0544801
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003210
FACILITY_NAME
TEXACO TRUCK STOP
STREET_NUMBER
7500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95378
APN
25015018
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7500 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report:Groundwater-quality Monitoring—July 27,2004: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy,CA. Page 3 <br /> When the tanks were removed, it was found that fuel hydrocarbons had leaked from <br /> _- underground piping beneath the fuel pump islands of the former fueling station. The <br /> L . former locations of the fuel pump islands are also shown on Figure 2. At the same time <br /> that the tanks were removed from the site, soil heavily affected by fuel hydrocarbons was <br /> excavated from beneath the pump island area and 521.25 tons of that material were <br /> disposed off-site at a permitted facility. In addition, some 2,000 gallons of floating <br /> product and affected groundwater were removed from the subsurface by pumping from a <br /> tank pit into a vacuum truck, which was used to transport it to a permitted recycling <br /> facility(Dietz Irrigation 1999a). <br /> An initial phase of site characterization work was completed in May 2000. It included the <br /> L ? installation of seven groundwater-quality monitoring wells (Nos. MW-1 through MW-7) <br /> at the locations shown on Figure 2 and was followed by a series of quarterly rounds of <br /> groundwater-quality monitoring. An extended phase of site characterization was initiated <br /> j on March 25, 2002; it included the installation of an additional eight groundwater-quality <br /> monitoring wells, numbered MW-3A, MW-3B, MW-8 through MW-12, and MW-12A. It <br /> a was completed on April 11, 2002, with a round of groundwater sampling and analysis <br /> that encompassed all 15 groundwater-quality monitoring wells by then extant on the site <br /> (The San Joaquin Company, 2002c). Quarterly groundwater-quality monitoring then <br /> continued until April 2004, when seven additional groundwater-quality monitoring wells, <br /> numbered MW-13 through MW-19 were installed as part of-a further phase of site <br /> characterization. That phase of site characterization was completed by a round of <br /> groundwater sampling and analysis on April 30, 2004 (The San Joaquin Company Inc. <br /> <= ' 2004a). This present report documents a round of groundwater-quality monitoring that <br /> was conducted on July 26 and 27, 2004, utilizing all 22 groundwater-quality monitoring <br /> wells that were present on the site by that date, <br /> When groundwater was first recovered from groundwater-quality monitoring well MW-7 <br /> .: on May 11, 2000, the sample contained moderate concentrations of Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TPHd) and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons quantified <br /> as gasoline (TPHg), with commensurate concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethyl <br /> benzene and total xylene isomers (BTEX) and 22 µg/L of methyl-tertiary butyl ether, a <br /> 1-.4 fuel oxygenate. Thereafter, the concentration of components of fuel hydrocarbons <br /> followed an increasing trend until the analytes of concern exceeded their maximum <br /> solubility in water (see Table 2). However, as early as the sampling round performed on <br /> November 28, 2000, no MTBE was detected in the samples recovered from Monitoring <br /> Well MW-7. It is believed that this does not indicate that, by that time, the groundwater <br /> in the vicinity of that well was free of MTBE. Rather, it indicates that the high <br /> concentrations of other components of fuel hydrocarbons were such as to raise the <br /> method detection limit of the MTBE analysis to a level greater than the concentration of <br /> jthat analyte actually present in that groundwater sample. <br /> By April 11, 2002, it was clear that floating product was present in the surface of the <br /> groundwater in Monitoring Well MW-7, as predicted. It continued to be present at <br /> various apparent thicknesses up to 0.58 ft. until an LNAPL-purging program in that well <br /> was initiated on .November 8, 2003. As part of the further extension of the site <br /> sic <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.