Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Extended Plume Definition:-7500 W 111h St., Tracy,CA. Page 15 <br /> depths to groundwater in all wells were available for the same date, the depth to groundwater <br /> in all wells -both pre-existing and newly-installed -was measured on April 30. By managing <br /> the sampling round in that way, it was possible for all the requisite work to be completed by <br /> April 30, as required by the SJCEHD-directed schedule. The procedures used to measure the <br /> depth to groundwater and to sample and analyze the groundwater in the monitoring wells are <br /> described below. <br /> i <br /> 4.10.1 Determination of Groundwater Elevations <br /> The depth from the top of the casing to the water table was measured using a conductivity <br /> meter. That data, together with the floating product monitoring well data (see Section 5A), <br /> was used to compute the groundwater table elevations relative to MSL that are shown in <br /> Table 3. The computed groundwater table elevations were used to produce Figure 9, a <br /> contour map of the groundwater table and to determine the direction and magnitude of the <br /> groundwater flow gradient. The groundwater in the area of the Navarra wells flows to the <br /> north-northeast.at a gradient of 0.003 fl/ft. <br /> As was discussed in Section 4.8 above, while the general direction and the gradient of the <br /> groundwater flow at the 7500 West Eleventh Street site as computed from the data gathered <br /> during the April 2004 sampling round is consistent with those found throughout the history , <br /> of monitoring at the site, the additional wells that were installed at that time have permitted <br /> the detail of the contour pattern to be enhanced. As is shown on Figure 9, that detail confirms <br /> the presence of a relatively high permeability zone in the subsurface that extends north- <br /> northeast from the area where the fuel hydrocarbons were released to the subsurface down- <br /> gradient along the primary plume of affected groundwater. <br /> 4.10.2 Well Purging <br /> After the depths to groundwater were measured, a small-diameter, submersible pump was <br /> used to purge each groundwater-quality monitoring well to be sampled of stagnant water. <br /> The pumped water was discharged into 5-gal. pails, each of which was, in turn, discharged <br /> into an open-topped, 55-gallon drum. Periodically during the well purging operation, the <br /> drum was decanted into the 1,100 gallon, polyethylene holding tank on the 7500 West <br /> Eleventh Street property. <br /> During the purging procedure, the temperature, electrical conductivity and pH of the stream <br /> of purge water were monitored by periodically checking those parameters using a multi- <br /> function electronic meter. Purging continued until all three parameters stabilized, i.e., <br /> variations between measurements are less than 10%. The array of parametric results for each <br /> well is recorded in the field notes found in Appendix B. <br /> 4.10.3 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> After purging, samples were recovered from each monitoring well to be sampled using a <br /> disposable bailer. Water brought to the surface in the bailers was decanted via a discharge <br /> spigot valve placed in the bottom of the bailer so as to completely fill clean glassware <br /> sic <br />