Laserfiche WebLink
Evaluation of Natural Attenuation: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. Page Ib <br /> i <br /> Esr 4.3 Sampling and Laboratory Analyses for Components of Fuel Hydrocarbons <br /> -- n5 <br /> After completing the sampling of groundwater for analyses for natural attenuation <br /> parameters and measurement of the depth to groundwater in each well, additional <br /> samples were recovered for the purpose of analyzing fuel hydrocarbons. As is required by <br /> good practice, each of the wells was purged prior to recovery of the samples used for <br /> ' analysis. <br /> �o <br /> 4.3.1 Purging of Groundwater-quality Monitoring Wells <br /> A small-diameter submersible pump was used to purge each well of stagnant water. The <br /> pumped water was discharged into 5-gallon pails, each of which was, in turn, discharged <br /> into a 55-gallon drum. The water in the drum was periodically discharged into a 1,100- <br /> gallon holding tank on the 7500 West Eleventh Street property. <br /> f :# During the purging procedure, the temperature and electrical conductivity of the stream <br /> of purge water was monitored by checking those parameters periodically using a multi- <br /> function electronic meter. Purging continued until both parameters stabilized (i.e., <br /> variations between measurements were less than 10%) or, in the case of wells screened <br /> above the water table, until a minimum of 15 gallons of groundwater had been removed, <br /> whichever was greater. The array of parametric results for each well is recorded in SJC's <br /> field notes (see Field Notes, Appendix B). <br /> Inspection of the temperature and conductivity data in the field notes shows that both <br /> parameters stabilized to within plus or minus 10% after the first few measurements were <br /> made on the purge water discharged from each well. This parametric stability is sufficient <br /> to demonstrate adequate well purging according to criteria suggested by the SJCEHD <br /> (San Joaquin County Public Health Services 2000). However, it is SJC's standard <br /> practice when purging shallow monitoring wells that have casings slotted in the zone <br /> above the water table at sites where groundwater is affected by analytes of concern that <br /> are lighter than water, regardless of the temperature, conductivity and pH data obtained, <br /> to purge a minimum quantity of groundwater equal to the casing volume plus the void <br /> =j space in the annular filter pack between the casing and the borehole wall. That volume (in <br /> this case, 15 gallons) is much greater than the three to five casing volumes that is often <br /> erroneously considered to be sufficient to purge adequately a well of that type and it is <br /> almost always greater than the volume that would be permissible based on the physical <br /> properties of the purge water alone. <br /> �< 4.3.2 Well Recovery Time <br /> After the wells were purged, the length of time required for the ground water in each well <br /> � i <br /> to return to its original elevation was noted. This additional procedure was performed <br /> following a request by SJCEHD Case Officer. <br /> Observations of the time required for the well to recover after it has been drawn down by <br /> pumping can be a useful indicator of the hydrogeologic properties of the formation into <br /> sic <br />