Laserfiche WebLink
Evaluation of Natural Attenuation: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. Page 23 <br /> monitoring program conducted at the site. As is documented in Table 2, no 1,2-DCA or <br /> EDB were detected in samples from any of the wells conducted during that period. <br /> In a meeting held on January 18, 2005 at its offices in Stockton, the SJCEHD directed <br /> that the next round of groundwater-quality sampling be expanded from the scope <br /> previously approved for the immediately preceding rounds of groundwater-quality <br /> monitoring to again include analyses for EDB and 1,2 DCA. This direction was given <br /> r even though: 1) several rounds of groundwater-quality monitoring at the site had <br /> j demonstrated that no detectable concentrations of EDB or 1,2 DCA were present, either <br /> within or beyond the plume of affected groundwater emanating from the 7500 West <br /> Eleventh Street property when the analyses were performed by laboratory methods <br /> having Method Detection Limits (MDLs) less than or equal to the maximum contaminant <br /> - levels (MCL) established by Title 22 of The California Code of Regulations (CCR); and <br /> 2) there was no reason to believe that ethanol or methanol had been components of any of <br /> 1 the fuels stored in the underground tanks on that site. <br /> In strict compliance with SJCEHD's direction, SJC again included EDB and 1,2 DCA in <br /> the suite of analytes for the groundwater samples recovered from each of the monitoring <br /> -=� wells extant on the site in early March 2005. <br /> `j The results of those analyses for 1,2-DCA and EDB on samples recovered from the <br /> groundwater quality monitoring wells in March 2005 are also documented in Table 2. As <br /> can be seen by examination of that table, none were detected. This conclusively <br /> demonstrates that neither of those two lead scavengers is present in the groundwater <br /> >rl beneath the Navarra site. <br /> 4_:{ 6.3 Absence of Alcohols in Groundwater <br /> At the meeting held on January 18, 2005 at SJCEHD offices, agency staff also directed <br /> that the March 2005 round of groundwater-quality monitoring include analyses for the <br /> alcohols ethanol and methanol. The request was made despite the fact that analyses for <br /> ethanol had been performed during several earlier monitoring rounds and none had been <br /> '? detected. Moreover, there is no evidence that the tanks that had been located at the 7500 <br /> -'' West Eleventh Street site had, at any time, contained any ethanol, methanol or any other <br /> alcohol additive. As was readily predictable, the results of the March 2005 sampling <br /> :3 round that are recorded in Table 2 again demonstrated that neither ethanol nor methanol <br /> are present in groundwater beneath the site. <br /> sic <br />