Laserfiche WebLink
Evaluation of Natural Attenuation: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. Page 41 <br /> 8.0 OPTIMAL MONITORING DATES AND FREQUENCY <br /> The groundwater-quality monitoring data that has been gathered at the 7500 West <br /> ! Eleventh Street site since May 2000 can be analyzed to provide guidance for designing a <br /> cost-effective, optimal monitoring schedule that provides the data necessary to monitor <br /> the groundwater-quality trend with time and to check for unexpected changes in plume <br /> 13 geometry. <br /> f : <br /> 8.1 Optimal Monitoring Dates <br /> It has long been observed that at many sites where groundwater is affected by <br /> components of fuel hydrocarbons, the concentrations of analytes of concern in the <br /> ` groundwater rise and fall periodically at a remarkably consistent frequency. Because <br /> these fluctuations were often associated with seasonal changes, it became traditional for <br /> F= 3 groundwater-quality monitoring programs to call for a quarterly monitoring schedule. <br /> However, although such scheduling can be useful during the initial phase of a <br /> groundwater-monitoring program to investigate the actual frequency of cyclical changes <br /> '. in contaminant concentration, there is no scientific basis for extending quarterly <br /> groundwater-quality monitoring tinto a long-term monitoring program (United States <br /> Environmental Protection Agency 2005). A cost-effective, long-term monitoring program <br /> should be based on a groundwater-sampling frequency that permits the concentrations of <br /> analytes of concern to be measured at the time of the year when concentrations are likely <br /> to be at their highest, or, if additional data density is required, at both that time and at the <br /> time of year when concentrations of analytes of concern in groundwater are likely to be <br /> their lowest. Monitoring schedules of this type permit the long-term trend of groundwater <br /> quality to be monitored and the trends reliably observed while monitoring costs are <br /> reduced to a practical minimum without loss of statistical confidence in regression and <br /> other groundwater-quality trend analyses. <br /> The periodic fluctuations in the concentrations of components of fuel hydrocarbons in <br /> groundwater at affected sites are caused by groundwater rising and falling in elevation <br /> relative to the zone of subsurface soils that are the most severely affected by the fuel <br /> >� hydrocarbon contamination. Because fuel hydrocarbons are less dense than water, when <br /> they are released at a source, light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) floats on the <br /> surface of the groundwater and there are high concentrations of components of the fuel <br /> adsorbed onto soil particles in a zone that extends some distance above the highest <br /> elevation of periodic groundwater table depth down to the depth of the greatest depth to <br /> } which the groundwater table recedes. Within that zone, the highest concentrations are <br /> present close to the high groundwater table elevation and the lowest are present at the low <br /> groundwater table elevation. As fluctuations in groundwater flow cause the groundwater <br /> table to rise and fall over this "smear zone," contaminants are slowly desorbed from the <br /> soil and pass into solution in the groundwater. Therefore, when groundwater is high, the <br /> total volume of heavily-affected soil in contact with groundwater is large, so that <br /> } concentrations of dissolved components of hydrocarbons reach their high periodic levels. <br /> Conversely, when groundwater levels are low, the volume of soil that serves as a source <br /> of contamination to groundwater is at a minimum and concentrations fall. <br /> k sic <br />