My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004702 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
31717
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0400661
>
SU0004702 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:07 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 11:15:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0004702
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0400661
STREET_NUMBER
31717
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
APN
25919001
ENTERED_DATE
11/17/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
31717 S CHRISMAN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/9/2004 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CHRISMAN\31717\PA-0400661\SU0004702\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> Iq <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton - CA 95202-2708 <br /> • �. (209)468-3420-Fax:(209)464-0138 - Web:www-co-san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> Qllfio�. <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: iI( �E PA#: ` 00b. <br /> E <br /> REPORT DATE: b 45 <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development p <br /> I = Insufficient q ty evelo ment Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL. <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate andlor any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> i 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> _..- ❑ ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. . <br /> ❑ ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ �� 3,1 Description of all current oft-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ;® ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and roundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site.,Ao, + ,+ to cos <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Iianztch/Finnemore,or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> F-1 Ca-!' <br /> Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers,lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> 0 ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ❑ ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concem,at and/or around the proiect site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ ❑ 5.2 The attachmentslappendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: <br /> Reviewed Date: <br /> E14D 26-02-002 /j Page 1 of 2 <br /> 7/1412003 / aftE,� �l� Surface&Sub Chtcklist <br /> ffffoXTTT-' ��a �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.