Laserfiche WebLink
(moi, <br /> r�Innaccordance with EHD standards, greater than 6 inches of head water was introduced into the test <br /> boring, thus illustrating that the soil characteristics are too porous for acceptable permeability. <br /> To mitigate this problem, any future seepage pit drilled on this parcel should be drilled to only 18 <br /> feet allowing an approximate five foot buffer of clay soil before effluent would enter this porous <br /> sandy material. Or, a seepage pit could be drilled to 25 feet and backfilled with a loamy material to <br /> the depth of the encountered sandy interval. With regard to the shallow perc test at 42 inches, the <br /> test result shows.a perc rate of 62.5 min/in. However, observing the mathematical calculations, it <br /> is noted that four hundreds of tenths of a foot (0.04 ft) translate to 0.48 inches when converted. <br /> This should be rounded up to 0.05 inches since it is impossible to measure a perc rate in hundreds <br /> of an inch. This places the perc rate right at the passing rate of 60 min/in. <br /> All of the above information regarding parcel S; the shallow and deep perc tests, mitigation <br /> measures and mathematical calculations were verbally discussed with Mike Huggins of EHD on <br /> May 24, 2005, with his concurrence. <br /> As noted on Table 1, the original perc tests on parcel 4 had failing rates. It was subsequently <br /> decided to drill further into the interior of the parcel from MacArthur Road. Care was taken to drill <br /> in a safe location since there are natural gas and oil pipelines traversing this parcel. The second <br /> tests illustrates marginally passing rates for the shallow boring based upon the mathematical <br /> discrepancies discussed above, and an acceptable rate for the sump-depth perc test at 22.7 min/in. <br /> Sumps may provide a higher level of protection against nitrate loading. Considering a new law <br /> that maybe implemented which may ban seepage pits (Assembly Bill 885), EHD may require <br /> sumps be installed for all of the proposed Parcels. It will be at the discretion of EHD to 1.) Install <br /> leachlines exclusively on the Parcels with acceptable shallow perc rates, 2.) Install leachlines and <br /> sumps, or 3.) Install leachlines and seepage pits based on the criteria explained above. <br /> EHD requires that there be sufficient distance for"treatment" of septic effluent before it encounters <br /> the groundwater table. This distance is normally regarded to be five feet in leachlines and 10 feet <br /> with seepage pits. Therefore, sufficient distance exists between the bottom of a maximum depth <br /> seepage pit of 25 feet and the assumed groundwater depth of 78 feet. <br /> The number of leachlines, sumps and/or seepage pits, and septic tank sizes are unknown for each <br /> of�thearcels at this time since the number of bedrooms for each structure is unknown. <br /> V o engineered septic systems are anticipated for this subdivision. Each new system must have a <br /> 50% standby replacement area incorporated into the design of the septic system. All related septic <br /> system structures and the new domestic wells must comply with the published "distance" <br /> requirements from property borders, roads, irrigation fields, irrigation canals, and all pipelines. <br /> The observed nitrate concentration of 48 ppm as nitrate may be attributed to the seepage <br /> pit/outhouse that served the old residential structure. The indigenous clay surface soil would be <br /> expected to offer some mitigation effect against nitrate formation and movement from agricultural <br /> inputs. <br /> j, <br /> Page A 0- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />