Laserfiche WebLink
Report: Groundwater-quality Monitoring—October 27, 2003: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. Page 12 <br /> L, that conclusion. As is shown on Figure 2, Monitoring Well MW-5 is located at the <br /> extreme western perimeter of the plume of affected groundwater. <br /> The sample recovered on October 27, 2003 from Monitoring Well MW-6, contained <br /> diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons at a concentration of 55 pg/L, which is a reduction <br /> from the 130 µg/L of organic compounds in the diesel range detected in July. However, it <br /> is not possible to assign all of that reduction to an actual decrease of diesel in the sample <br /> compared to its predecessor because the sample recovered on July 30 was not pre-treated <br /> with EPA Method 3630, while the sample recovered on October 27, 2003 was. Because it <br /> was appropriately pre-treated, the result from the October 27 sampling round is <br /> considered to be a positive indicator of the presence of diesel-range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in the groundwater at the location of Monitoring Well MW-6. Gasoline, at <br /> a concentration of 130 µg/L was also detected in the sample recovered from Monitoring <br /> Well MW-6. It had previously been detected in groundwater in that well, but had been <br /> absent since July 29, 2002. The only other analyte of concern detected in the well on <br /> bm October 27, 2003 was MTBE at a concentration of 130 µg/L. <br /> On the eastern perimeter of the plume, diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons at a <br /> -- concentration of 89 pg/L were detected in the sample recovered on October 27, 2003 <br /> from Monitoring Well MW-9. This finding supports the tentative conclusion drawn from <br /> the July 30 sampling round that diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons had, by that time, <br /> �- made an initial appearance in Monitoring Well MW-9. The result from July 30 was <br /> considered to be uncertain with respect to the presence of diesel because the sample had <br /> not been pre-treated with silica gel and a false positive result could not be ruled out. The <br /> sample recovered from Monitoring Well MW-10 contained no detectable concentration <br /> of diesel but did contain gasoline-range compounds at a concentration of 200 µg/L, which <br /> is the highest concentration reported in a sample from that well to date. Similarly, the <br /> 'W concentration of MTBE, the only other analyte of concern detected in MW-10, reached a <br /> new high of 130 µg/L. These findings suggest that the plume of affected groundwater <br /> may be expanding, to some degree, towards the east, but there is presently insufficient <br /> data to confirm such a trend. <br /> 2.4.1.3 Analytes of Concern in Secondary Groundwater Plume <br /> As is also shown on Figure 2, a secondary plume of diesel and gasoline emanates from an <br /> area to the rear and slightly to the east of the Casa Mendoza restaurant on the 7500 West <br /> Eleventh Street property. The sample recovered from Monitoring Well MW-12 on <br /> October 27, 2003 contained 130 �tg/L of petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel range, 120 <br /> µg/L of gasoline and 3.6 pg/L of benzene. These concentrations are at the lower end of <br /> `~ the range of concentrations previously detected in samples from that well, which <br /> concentrations have exhibited a declining trend since July 29, 2002. <br /> `r 2.4.2 Groundwater Quality in the Deeper Confined Aquifers <br /> In compliance with SJCEHD guidance for the groundwater monitoring program at the <br /> 7500 West Eleventh Street site, a sample was recovered from Monitoring Well MW-3A <br /> sic <br />