Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Item No . 2 <br /> PC - 3-21-815 <br /> GP-8578/PD-85-1/S-85-2 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Easements are shown on the tentative map; however, the . <br /> design and siting of the proposal recognizes, and there <br /> k fore does not conflict with, these easements .. <br /> H. The proposed facilities and improvements are consistent with <br /> the General Plan: <br /> The proposed improvements do not conflict with General . <br /> Plan requirements . <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The project involves three separate elements ; two of those, the <br /> Text Amendment and the Planned District , require action by the <br /> Board of Supervisors. For the remaining element , the sub- <br /> division, approval authority rests with the Planning Commission <br /> ( in the absence of an appeal) . Therefore, the recommendations <br /> are as follows : <br /> 1 . Adopt a .Negative Declaration for the project . <br /> 2 . Approve the subdivision request based on the subdivision <br /> findings and subject to the conditions noted in the staff. <br /> report . <br /> 3 . Refer the Planned 'District request and Site Plan to thea <br /> Board of Supervisors and recommend approval - based on the <br /> Planned District findings noted in the staff report,.. (If <br /> the Board of Supervisors should require modifications to the <br /> Site Plan, the. Planning Commission would review and approve <br /> the. Revised Site Plan. ) <br /> 4 . Refer the General Plan Amendment to the Board of Supervisors <br /> and recommend approval based on the findings noted in the <br /> staff report. <br />