My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012276
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544801
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:09 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 11:16:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012276
RECORD_ID
PR0544801
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003210
FACILITY_NAME
TEXACO TRUCK STOP
STREET_NUMBER
7500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95378
APN
25015018
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7500 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report: Groundwater-quality Monitoring—July 14-15,2006, 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy,CA. Page 12 <br /> 2.5 Groundwater Quality in the Near-Surface Unconfined Aquifer <br /> `- The results of analyses of samples of groundwater recovered in July 2006 are evaluated <br /> below. <br /> 2.5.1 Analytes of Concern in Groundwater Along Principal Plume Axis <br /> Monitoring Wells MW-3, MW-13, MW-7, MW-14 and MW-18 are, as is shown on <br /> Figure 3, arrayed along the approximate long axis of the primary plume of affected <br /> groundwater. As can be seen by inspection of Table 2, compared to the concentrations of <br /> analytes of concern that were found in the groundwater samples recovered from those <br /> 16m wells in March 2006, the concentrations in the samples recovered in July 2006 were <br /> generally higher than those measured in samples recovered from the same wells. The <br /> concentration of TPHg in the groundwater in Monitoring Well MW-3 rose from 760 gglL <br /> to 3,100 gglL and benzene rose from 150 gg/L to 1,100 µg/L. Those increases are <br /> consistent with the trends established by analysis of early data recovered from the site <br /> that shows that the concentrations of analytes of concern in groundwater peak during <br /> June or July of each year (The San Joaquin Company 2006b). Although, the increase in <br /> concentrations of analytes of concern found in wells further down the groundwater <br /> gradient were much more modest when the results from the July 2006 monitoring round <br /> are compared to the results from the March 2006 sampling event, they also support that <br /> annual trend. <br /> 2.5.2 Anal es of Concern in Groundwater around Fringes of Principal Plume <br /> i, Examination of the results of the analyses (see Table 2) of the groundwater sample <br /> recovered from Monitoring Well MW-5 on July 14, 2006 show that MTBE remains at <br /> trace concentration in that area on the western fringe of the principal plume of affected <br /> groundwater. Further to the north, at Monitoring Well MW-17, which is also on the <br /> western fringe of the plume, there also continues to be a trace of MTBE in the <br /> groundwater in that well. <br /> The samples recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-4, MWFP-2 and MWFP-5 in July <br /> 2006 contained only minor traces of a few analytes of concern, which demonstrates that <br /> +•• the eastern perimeter of the principal plume of affected groundwater has remained stable <br /> since samples were recovered from wells in that area during the March 2006 groundwater <br /> monitoring event. <br /> At the down-gradient limit of the primary plume of affected groundwater, only a trace <br /> concentration of MTBE, at a concentration of 30 µg/l, was detected in the groundwater <br /> �- sample recovered on July 14, 2006 from Monitoring Well MW-11, which compares to a <br /> concentration of 3.6 µg/l, in the sample recovered from that well in March 2006. <br /> However, given the absence of any other analytes of concern in the sample of <br /> L- groundwater recovered from that well and the fact that the groundwater in Monitoring <br /> sic <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.