Laserfiche WebLink
r ENVIRON MENTAL HEALTH IEPARTMENT <br /> pU1N <br /> ° c SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> s y Program Coordinators <br /> N." .� Donna K. Heran, R.E.H.S. <br /> Director 304 East Weber Avenue,Third Floor Carl Borgman, R.E.H.S. <br /> Laurie A. Cotulla, R.E.H.S. Stockton,California 95202-2708 Mike Huggins, R.E.H.S., R.D.I. <br /> cq�iko'aN�P Assistant Director Telephone:(209)468-3420 Margaret Lagorio, R.E.H.S. <br /> Robert McClellon, R.E.H.S. <br /> Fax: (209)464-0138 .Teff Carruesco, R.E.H.S. <br /> Website:www.sjgov.org/ehd/ Kasey Foley,R.E.H.S. <br /> A R AND M E GLOVER AUG 2 9 2006 <br /> FAYETTE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION <br /> P O BOX 61 <br /> TRACY CA 95378 <br /> RE: Fayette Manufacturing Corporation <br /> 7675 Eleventh Street <br /> Tracy, California <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has received and reviewed <br /> Risk Assessment for the Fayette Manufacturing Site (RA) dated 06 March 2006, prepared <br /> by your consultant ATC Associates, Inc. (ATC) for the above referenced site. In addition, <br /> the EHD has reviewed groundwater monitoring data acquired 26 January 2006. The <br /> conclusion presented in the RA was that there are no significant risks to human health <br /> concerns by direct exposure to residual contamination on the site. It was also concluded <br /> that the potential for vapor intrusion was not likely to occur as the site is paved with <br /> asphalt. <br /> On 19 July 2006, the EHD met with representatives of the Central Valley Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) to present your site for closure consideration. The <br /> CVRWQCB representatives were concerned with the recent increase of contaminant <br /> concentrations in monitoring wells MW2 and MW-3. The CVRWQCB representatives also <br /> noted that no remediation attempts had been conducted to reduce the concentrations of <br /> contaminants in the source area. The CVRWQCB was not in favor of closure <br /> consideration at this time. <br /> Further review of the RA lead the EHD to a determination that the site data had not been <br /> correctly applied to the risk analyses. ATC applied soil analytical data acquired on 05 April <br /> 2004 to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board's (SFBRWQCB) <br /> Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs)for deep soil (more than 3 meters in depth) and in <br /> the Johnson Ettinger Soil Gas Model. There are several problems with the use of only this <br /> data and the deep soil model: <br /> • With the possible exception of the CPT-1 sample, the soil samples acquired on or <br /> about 05 April 2006 were collected well outside the source area previously shown <br /> to be significantly impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline <br /> (TPH-g) or diesel (TPH-d) or by benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes <br /> (BTEX). <br /> • The CPT1-S25 data, while collected nearer to the area of known significant impact <br /> to soil, was collected at a depth (25 feet below surface grade), which had been <br /> previously shown to not be impacted even in the most intensely impacted area <br /> (See Table 1 of Problem Assessment Report (PAR) dated 07 November 1995; for <br />