Laserfiche WebLink
D. GROUNDWATER 'INFORMATION <br /> NLS§ 2.1,._SSS§4:T.: Groundwater depths and elevations throughout San Joaquin County are <br /> illustrated on maps published by the County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. <br /> However, due to the high degree of variability in groundwater elevations iii the Tracy area, <br /> groundwater lines of equal-depth and equal elevation are not drawn for this area. The last map <br /> denoting lines'of'equal elevation for the Tracy area was published in 1992, and show the general <br /> groundwater flow to be in-a northeasterly direction, toward the San.Joaquin River. However, <br /> recent studies of the:groundwater flow under the project site; indicate the flow direction to be in a <br /> westerly direction: <br /> The on-site-domestic well, which is approximately 175 feet north-northwest from the proposed <br /> disposal area, was sounded with the standing water level measured at 9:0 feet from the top of the <br /> Vii?casing. This corresponds with the backhoe test pit water table depth determination. <br /> The backhoe test pitwas used to measure depth, and sample the water table. The static water. <br /> level was determined to'be at 9.5 ft in the proposed location of the effluent disposal area. This.. <br /> groundwater depth measurement occurred at the beginning of irrigation season; so the potential <br /> may exist for the water table-to rise slightly higher at the end of the irrigation season. With. , <br /> concurrence from EHD,a water table depth of 9.5 ft is sufficient depth to install a conventional <br /> filter bed leachfield system to a maximum depth of 42 inches. This is due to the required <br /> separation distance of five feet that must be maintained between the soil-effluent interface and the <br /> highest depth to the groundwater table. Conversations with representatives of Schack& <br /> Company anticipate that there will be very little change between the current filter bed area ground <br /> elevation and the final elevation after project construction. The following calculations <br /> demonstrate the five ft separation distance: <br /> 9.5 ft— 114 inches minus 5 ft.(60 inches) = 54 inches. The maximum depth of the filter bed is not <br /> to exceed 42 inches; therefore,there:is a 54 - 42,= 12 inch safety factor. -Potential rise in the water . <br /> table elevation from "mounding" of the percolating effluent is calculated°to be nonexistent and <br /> discussed on the following Page. <br /> Another critical issue regarding'the groundwater elevation in combination with the five-foot, <br /> separation distance, is that the water table cannot encroach up to the septic tank, which may cause . <br /> buoyancy. This is discussed in the "Conclusions and Recommendations" Section of this Report. <br /> No well log was found in EHD files for the referenceddomestic well, so underlying lithology <br /> could not be determined. In addition, the well.had no electricity to it, so well water could not be <br /> sampled and tested to determine nitrate loading impacts from historical on-site and surrounding <br /> land uses,or to use in the nitrate loading calculations. <br /> NLS§ 2.2,3.1/SSS§ 2 1, 4.2. _Since surrounding properties have been intensely farmed for . - <br /> 1. <br /> 1, <br /> decades,the potential for-nitrate.contamination in the underlying groundwater can be <br /> considered to be significant. However, groundwater research:in the scientific literature suggests <br /> there may be a large denitrification potential within aquifers or saturated zones composed of a fine <br /> clay soil fraction, which was encountered at the.1 I ft depth (See Table 1). <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />