Laserfiche WebLink
�.+ A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> L <br /> •.. groundwater generally ranges from -400 millivolts (mV) to 800 mV. Under oxidizing conditions <br /> the redox potential of groundwater is positive while reducing conditions are negative. Therefore, <br /> with aerobic biodegradation depleting groundwater of oxygen within a hydrocarbon plume, the <br /> redox potential inside a hydrocarbon plume should be less than that measured outside the plume <br /> (Buscheck and O'Reilly, 1995). <br /> Indicators of potential intrinsic biodegradation occurring across a dissolved contaminant plume <br /> can be summarized by the following trends: <br /> A relative decrease in: A relative increase in: <br /> dissolved oxygen ferrous iron <br /> oxidation-reduction potential alkalinity <br /> nitrate carbon dioxide <br /> sulfate hydrogen sulfide <br /> L <br /> 4.1.1 Conditions at Former Fayette Manufacturing Site <br /> Between September 1996 and June 1997, groundwater samples collected from each of the site's <br /> monitoring wells were analyzed for specific geochemical parameters to determine if intrinsic <br /> bioremediation is occurring at the site. In addition, grab groundwater samples were collected <br /> from soil borings during this time period and were also analyzed for specific geochemical <br /> parameters. <br /> Dissolved oxygen concentrations in groundwater within the contaminant plume ranged from <1.0 <br /> to 1.2 mg/kg (MW3) to 2.1 ppm (SB6)while concentrations outside the plume ranged from <1.0 <br /> to 1.8 mg/kg (MW I). Throughout the site dissolved oxygen concentrations were generally below <br /> detection limits (<1.0 ppm) in the groundwater samples collected from the borings. Thus, these <br /> results are somewhat ambiguous for interpretation of bioactivity. Where dissolved oxygen was <br /> detected, the concentrations in the monitoring wells inside the plume (MW2 and MW3) were <br /> slightly lower than those outside the plume. It appears that dissolved oxygen could be a good <br /> indicator for groundwater in the wells. According to Buscheck and O'Reilly, 1995, sufficient <br /> dissolved oxygen concentrations for aerobic biodegradation of BTEX are >1 to 2 mg/L. The <br /> concentrations of dissolved oxygen in the plume beneath this site generally fall within this range. <br /> Thus, aerobic biodegradation is most-likely occurring within the dissolved contaminant plume. <br /> r <br /> Carbon dioxide concentrations, which were generally higher within the contaminant plume than in <br /> the borings and wells outside the plume, suggests microorganisms are present in the subsurface <br /> and biodegradation is occurring within the contaminant plume. Ferrous iron (dissolved iron) was <br /> not detected the borings. However, it was detected in the monitoring well samples at generally <br /> higher concentrations within the plume. Generally lower nitrate and sulfate levels within the <br /> �., contaminant plume and relatively higher levels outside the plume during the initial sampling event <br /> also supports evidence of anaerobic activity. Nitrate and sulfate are evidently acting as electron <br /> acceptors throughout the plume where the subsurface environment is oxygen deficient due to <br /> wA95122Vepods\Request for NFA doc 10 <br /> V <br />