Laserfiche WebLink
P� <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> 2. Groundwater in the uppermost water-bearing zone appears to be confined to semi confined. <br /> Groundwater flow beneath the site is generally northwest with a magnitude of 0.003 ft/ft, or <br /> approximately 16 ft/mile. <br /> 3. Petroleum hydrocarbon-affected soils are present primarily in the vicinity of the capillary <br /> fringe at approximately 8 to 12 feet bgs. The highest concentrations of TPHg and benzene are <br /> present in soil northwest of the former location of the gasoline USTs. The horizontal extent <br /> of TPHg and benzene and the presence of these contaminants in the capillary fringe are <br /> indicative of groundwater impact and advection. <br /> r <br /> ace appear to be essentially defined both laterally and <br /> 4. Petroleum hydrocarbons in the subsurf <br /> vertically, as evidenced by analytical data from the site's perimeter borings and deeper soil <br /> samples, respectively. Free-product was initially observed on-site during the collection of a <br /> groundwater grab sample from soil boring SB2 in September 1996, however subsequent soil <br /> borings advanced near SB2, including FPB-1, FPB-2, and MW-4, did not reveal the presence <br /> of free-product. <br /> 5. MTBE was not detected in any of the soil samples analyzed above laboratory detection limits <br /> by EPA methods 8020 or 8260. Furthermore, the highest concentration of benzene in soil <br /> detected during the various subsurface investigations was only 15 milligrams per kilogram <br /> (mg/kg). Historically, MTBE has been detected in groundwater samples collected from the <br /> site's borings/wells at concentrations up to 40 ug/L by laboratory EPA method 8020. <br /> However, the highest MTBE concentrations detected by EPA method 8260, a more reliable <br /> method, did not exceed 7.6 ug/L. A review of the most recent groundwater analytical results <br /> (June 1999) indicate that MTBE was not present in the dissolved hydrocarbon plume beneath <br /> the site (Table 2). <br /> 6. A groundwater receptor survey revealed thirteen wells are located within one half mile of <br /> the site. The on-site well is the closest groundwater receptor to the plume (within <br /> approximately 100 feet crossgradient of the plume). The estimated time for the <br /> hydrocarbon plume to reach the on-site domestic well by advection alone is 20 years. This <br /> assumed the well was screened in the shallow aquifer, a worst case scenario (Smith, 1997). <br /> 7. Based upon geotechnical and geochen&al data collected from groundwater and/or soil <br /> underlying the project site, intrinsic bioremediation is occurring in the contaminant plume <br /> beneath the site. The biodegradation processes in the first water bearing zone at the site have <br /> the capacity to degrade 52.1 mg/L of BTEX. The total BTEX detected during the April 1997 <br /> monitoring event was approximately 1.56 mg/L. As a result, the assimilative capacity is one <br /> order of magnitude greater than the BTEX that is present(Table 6). <br /> 8. Given the biodecay rates for TPHg (578 days) and benzene (408 days) the time required to <br /> biodegrade TPHg presently in groundwater to 100 ppb (taste, odor threshold) and benzene <br /> presently in groundwater to 1 ppb (MCL) has been estimated to be approximately 11 years. <br /> w:\95122Veports\ReVest for NFA doc 14 <br /> r <br />