Laserfiche WebLink
Joten P. Cummings & A <br /> g ssAiates <br /> Environmental Consultants <br /> ,i,Ar HEAl_lff <br /> Ph.(540)30607?2 FRVICE P.O.Box 2847 <br /> Fax1E1)7El-33t16 Fremont, CA 94836-2847 <br /> File No.0396012.00 99 JUN It; Alf tt34 <br /> June 7, 1999 <br /> Carol Oz, REHS <br /> San Joaquin County PHS-EHD <br /> 304 East Weber Ave. , 3rd Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> RE: Addendum Letter to the <br /> File Closure Report <br /> 7777 West Eleventh Street <br /> okcy . 9 7 6 <br /> S td- 'tb X243— - -- __--- <br /> Dear Ms Oz: <br /> This addendum is being forwarded to you, by John P. Cummings and <br /> Associates (JPCA) , to elucidate some of the information which was <br /> not clear and to correct the soil data errors in the original <br /> report, dated 10 May 1999. This information is submitted based <br /> on questions you and I discussed in our telephone conversation. <br /> The information found in Table A of the original File Closure <br /> Report was taken from MSDS, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, <br /> CRC Press, 18901 Cranwood Parkway, Cleveland Ohio and Conversion <br /> Factors, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. <br /> The Well Survey data reported by the City of Tracy was that no <br /> known wells exist to the north, (the Tracy City limits are <br /> adj-acent to the subject site boundary on the northern side) <br /> within 2,000 feet of the former UST excavation. A reconnaissance <br /> _ Lir automo�rie and binocularz conducted by JPCA did not observe <br /> any wells to the north of the subject site within 2,000 feet. <br /> The thickness of the first aquifer, identified as ten feet, was <br /> based on the field drilling soil analysis and boring log data. <br /> The Non Detectable boundary for soil was estimated from the field <br /> drilling and boring log data as well as the information <br /> identified in the SMITH Reports. The soil results from the <br /> boring identified as MW 3 along with the information contained in <br /> the SMITH Reports was used to ascertain the lateral limits of <br /> soil contamination. <br /> The TPHG data in Table B was erroneously transposed. The data <br /> from the original UST excavation report is not germane as the <br /> 1 <br />