Laserfiche WebLink
' K <br /> 4.0 Discussion and Estimate of Residual Contaminant <br /> TPHD contaminants were observed in well MW-3. SJC EHD has requested that Wright <br /> provide an estimate to quantity the residual dissolved contaminant for this sample event. <br /> Monitoring well MW-3 is located adjacent to the former underground tanks pit. TPHD has <br /> historically been observed in MW-3; other contaminants including BTEX and MTBE and <br /> fuel oxygenates have not been observed(see Table 3). <br /> Wright has made the following assumptions regarding the estimate of residual dissolved <br /> contaminants in the former tank pit area. The average of all TPHD detections is used since <br /> TPHD has been observed at various concentrations over time. Contaminants have not been <br /> observed in distant wells so an estimate of that aquifer area near MW-3 was made for a <br /> potential groundwater volume. This estimate uses the saturated thickness of the aquifer <br /> uses the length of the MW-3 slotted interval (15 feet) in an area (30 feet by 45 feet of the <br /> former tank pits) of 20,250 cubic feet and assumed effective porosity of 25% containing <br /> contaminated water(5,062 cubic feet)times 7.48 gallons per square foot,or <br /> 20,250 fe x 0.25=5,062 fe. 5,062 fe x 7.48 gallons/fe <br /> about 37,900 gallons groundwater containing residual contaminants near MW-3. <br /> The average of TPHD detections from September 2001 to December 2004 at MW-3 of <br /> 3,206 micrograms per liter (ug/1) divided by 8 detections) is 400 ug/l. The TPHG <br /> calculation used the only detection of 58 ug/1. It should be noted that changing these <br /> assumptions would yield different estimates. However in our opinion these assumptions <br /> appear reasonable given source removal and area of the former tank pits, historically <br /> observed concentrations of TPHD and lack of other dissolved contaminants. The residual <br /> contaminant estimate uses a simple calculation that calculates gallons of TPHD that may <br /> remain. Please note the contaminant volumes are rough estimates only of the interpreted <br /> contaminant quantity remaining. The quantity of estimated groundwater TPHD <br /> contaminant in micrograms per liter potentially present in the groundwater converted to <br /> gallons used the following equation: <br /> 4.0x10'ug/1(average TPHD concentration)x 3.79x105 gallons x 0.264 liter/gallon <br /> 0.004 gallons TPHD residual estimated <br /> One detection of TPHG occurred in 2001 and no other detections have occurred since. <br /> However,if the same equation is used with the same assumed volumes then, <br /> 5.8x19'ug/1 (TPHG concentration)x 3.79x105 gallons x 0.264 liter/gallon <br /> 0.00058 gallons TPHG residual estimated <br /> 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> Monitoring well MW-3 located near the former tank pit was sampled during this quarter. <br /> TPHD was present at 130 ug/1 in MW-3 and TPHG, BTEX and MTBE and oxygenates <br /> were not detected in that well. The laboratory reports that the TPHD in MW-3 does not <br /> quantify as a match the laboratory diesel standard. The TPHD values have fluctuated <br /> slightly with aquifer recharge and discharge. The TPHD appears degraded and is <br /> anticipated to continue to degrade. <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />