Laserfiche WebLink
Wright performed a site assessment, the results of which were presented in our report <br /> �-� dated May 10, 2001. This assessment revealed Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel <br /> (TPHD) contaminants in the vicinity of the former tank pits and very low dissolved <br /> concentrations in groundwater north of the former pit area. PHS EHD requested <br /> additional assessment of the dissolved plume together with a resample of the adjacent <br /> irrigation well. The irrigation well had revealed very low concentrations of TPHD-like <br /> contaminants, which Wright attributed to possible self-oiling pump equipment in the <br /> well. <br /> Field Methods <br /> Exploratory Borings <br /> Eight exploratory borings were drilled at the site (Figure 1) on July 23, and August 28, <br /> 2001. The borings were positioned to ascertain distribution of the contaminants in site <br /> soil and groundwater; the three-groundwater monitoring wells were installed using the <br /> groundwater data collected from the uncased boreholes. Drilling permits were secured <br /> from the PHS EHD, and all utilities were cleared prior to doing the fieldwork. The <br /> borings were used to define the uppermost aquifer strata, and two selected borings <br /> advanced through the former tank pits were advanced through the uppermost aquifer to <br /> the contact of, and into the underlying confining strata of the uppermost aquifer. Boring <br /> B-10 was drilled next to the irrigation water well to ascertain the presence of the thick <br /> �-� clay aquitard noted on the well drillers log and to sample for soil and groundwater <br /> contaminants. A PHS EHD representative observed portions of the push boring work and <br /> borehole sealing. <br /> Moderate to severe flowing conditions were encountered in some boreholes, which <br /> required drilling methods to be modified depending upon the severity of the flowing <br /> condition. Some soil samples were not recovered in some instances of severe flowing <br /> since the sampler could not be advanced to the desired depth. <br /> The boreholes were drilled with truck mounted hollowstem auger and/or direct push <br /> drilling equipment. All drilling equipment and sampling tools were cleaned prior to <br /> arriving, between driving samples and before leaving the site. The augers were advanced <br /> to the desired sampling depth interval, and a drive split spoon sampler were driven ahead <br /> of the drill bit. The sampler was then retrieved and dissembled, and the soil filled brass <br /> or acetate liners retained for chemical analysis, were sealed with Teflon® paper and <br /> plastic endcaps, labeled, logged onto chain-of-custody forms and place in a chilled ice <br /> chest on crushed ice. Drill cuttings were drummed and left on-site. <br /> The boreholes were logged using the Unified Soil Classification System under the <br /> supervision of a registered geologist. Additional lithologic information was collected to <br /> describe the subsurface geology. Soil samples were field screened for presence of <br /> contaminants by checking for presence of odor and staining, and a photoionization meter <br /> was used for soil field vapor measurement use. Soil samples were collected at minimum <br /> Page 2 <br />