Laserfiche WebLink
page 3, 1305 Escalon Ave. <br /> The CAP states in section 4.3.3 Groundwater, that"Until the actual cleanup goals are <br /> established...". According to CCR Title 23, section 2725(g(2)), "...the responsible party <br /> shall recommend target cleanup goals for long-term corrective actions to the regulatory <br /> agency for concurrence." Furthermore, regional groundwater cleanup goals are already <br /> available to GTI. Under the Porter-Cologne Act, waters of the State of California include <br /> both surface and groundwaters. Water quality goals for waters of the State can be found <br /> in "A Compilation of Water Quality Goals" (Central Valley RWQCB, August 2000) and <br /> "Fourth Edition of the Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan)for the Sacramento River <br /> and San Joaquin River Basins' (Central Valley RWQCB, September 1998). Both of <br /> these documents are available on the RWQCB website at www.swrcb.ca. oWnncb5. AS <br /> stated in the Basin Plan, unless otherwise designated by the RWQCB, all groundwaters <br /> in the Region are considered as suitable or potentially suitable, at a minimum, for <br /> municipal and domestic water supply, agricultural supply, industrial service supply, and <br /> industrial process supply. Therefore, the most protective, appropriate numerical water <br /> quality limit should be selected for a particular water body and constituent to protect all <br /> applicable beneficial uses of the water. San Joaquin County has established that <br /> primary and secondary drinking standards, known as maximum contaminant levels, are <br /> appropriate cleanup goals, at a minimum, for all contaminated underground storage tank <br /> sites within the county. <br /> Submit a revised Corrective Action Plan to PHS/EHD that addresses each of the above <br /> discussed concerns. Do not fail to include the following points: <br /> 1. A feasibility study. <br /> 2. Calculations of contaminant mass. <br /> 3. Complete and accurate cross-sectional diagrams. <br /> 4. Specific statements as to which VEW's will be used in the remediation and their <br /> calculated radius of influence. <br /> 5. Stated goals of the remediation. <br /> 6. A discussion, after review of the data, addressing why VEW-4 appeared to have <br /> greater influence on the monitoring wells than did VEW-3. <br /> Submit the revised CAP to PHS/EHD by March 2, 2001. Please include in the revised <br /> CAP a site specific Health and Safety Plan that was inadvertently left out of the original <br /> CAP. Also, please inform your consultant that the correct address for the subject site as <br /> listed in the San Joaquin County Office of the Assessor is 1305 Escalon Ave, not 1350. <br /> If you have any questions or comments please call Lori Duncan at (209)468-0337. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> // . CA [aA n o� <br /> I,CTt.� \ c.-% *4J7� <br /> Lori Duncan, Senior REHS Dot Lofstrom, RG <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV Registered Geologist, Unit IV <br /> cc: Marty Hartzell, CVRWQCB <br /> Ray Kablanow, GTI <br />