Laserfiche WebLink
GeobgkilTecaicsAM Page 4 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No.750.2 <br /> July 22,2003 <br /> pump into 40-m1 VOA vials preserved with hydrochloric acid or trisodium phosphate. Each <br /> sample container was checked for headspace bubbles, identified and labeled with a unique <br /> designation, inserted into foam holders and placed in a chilled ice chest for transport to the <br />' laboratory. All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a steam <br />` cleaner before and between uses. Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect <br /> Lall samples and were changed with each sampling event. <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected and their intended analyses, <br />' accompanied the samples from field to the laboratory, thereby providing a means to track <br /> the movement of and ensure the integrity of the samples. <br /> Groundwater monitoring field logs are included in Appendix C. <br /> 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br /> The groundwater samples collected on June 5, 2003, were delivered to Sherwood Labs of <br /> Hilmar, California(Department of Health Services Certification No. 1400), for analysis. <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed for: <br /> •` Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene(BTEX) by EPA method 8020/8015 <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> Additional samples were sent to Entech Analytical Labs, Inc. from Sherwood Labs for the <br /> analysis of: <br /> i <br /> • Fuel oxygenated compounds (MTBE, DIPS, ETBE, TAME & TBA) by EPA method <br /> 8260 <br /> I <br /> The detection limits for the above analyses are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A and the lab <br /> i L data are presented in Appendix B. <br /> As required under AB2886, the laboratory data was submitted electronically to GeoTracker <br /> is <br /> on June 19, 2003. The confinnation number is 4531946241. <br /> L <br /> 2.0 FINDINGS &RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Findings <br /> 4 The results of the groundwater sample analyses show the following: <br /> • All six monitoring wells were non-detect for all analyzed compounds. <br /> MW-1 was completely non-detect for the second consecutive monitoring event. Figure <br /> 5 illustrates groundwater elevation and TPH-G concentrations in MW-1 versus time. <br />