My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011787 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DAVIS
>
21600
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800093
>
SU0011787 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:35:26 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 5:20:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0011787
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800093
STREET_NUMBER
21600
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
DAVIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95242-
APN
01308043
ENTERED_DATE
5/2/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
21600 N DAVIS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
5/1/2018 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\D\DAVIS\21600\PA-1800093\SU0011787\SS_NL STUDY .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cPau�!y SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95205-6232 <br /> c. Pi Telephone: (209) 468-3420 Fax: (209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> � r <br /> SITE LOCATIO6D ,D"J <br /> e PA#: <br /> N: b N <br /> S REPORT DATE: <br /> S = sufficient <br /> I = InsufficientSan Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS C�`` — 44 1 <br /> V <br /> ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, direct%l flow and gradient. <br /> ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> EJ <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> E� ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site.Z;► If1�a `'1 ,�A N <br /> .�-J g rw,n <br /> [r ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitryto to soil and roundwater and the contribution of nitrate load f�om �}^ <br /> these sources to the project site. 2- D.t�r to y-Ge ���yslw�c(})2 <br /> 20 C"*o v c+ t 2 be_d roan <br /> [� ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources ofnitr/te o s�il a�1d groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. 13 Qoyv�p�ot� �� <br /> [q/ F-] 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of 1q0 AW, <br /> Hanztch/Flnnem or ther ro nate formula/mod �dl(Zni_" <br /> e <br /> �S"vtn LpprJprzv�st, � �O(�•fi:�,vrf `—� 3> <br /> Er ❑ 3.6 Calculated imp ct of nitr n loading from site project o ient wells, rivers, lakes <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULT PROPOS METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL c 24M – (\/ c�C <br /> 2/ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> El ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or anv other constituent of concern, at and/or around the r)roiect site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> F✓ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> E� ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: 0_ 0Reviewed Date: 1131 2C)j / <br /> EHD 26-02-002 Page I of 2 Nitrate Loading Study Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.