Laserfiche WebLink
j pulM . <br /> t o SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> c <br /> `-_-'p--'-'7 ° ' ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMEfv-1' <br /> .� 304 E Weber Avenue 3rd Floor Stockton ■ CA 95202-•2708 <br /> (209)468-3420 • Fax: (209)464-0138 • Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> •CfFOR� <br /> I SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> I SITE LOCATION: 400 N. DIETRICH ROAD, LINDEN PA#: 05-129(MS)REPORT DATE: 1/20/2005 <br /> r <br /> I <br /> 5 = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905, Section 9-905.12 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ® ❑ 1.1 Description of site (report must address all parcels), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> I <br /> + ® ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed development. <br /> ® ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. <br /> I <br /> + ® ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples: structures, drives,wells, septic systems, large trees, <br /> `[ pastures, pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways, etc.) <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ® ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information: current and/or previous property owners, historical maps, insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications, etc.) <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF.CONTAMINATION <br /> ® ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD records search, agricultural <br /> chemical application search, site reconnaissance and survey, etc.) <br /> ® ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use, a bovegroundlunderground tanks, <br /> septic systems, injection wells,unsealed wells, ponds/lagoons,vehicle/machine repair/painting, buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste, etc.) <br /> ® ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site (see examples above). <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station, in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact, etc.) <br /> ® ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. <br /> i <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATIO IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> ® ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> i proposed future uses of the project parcel. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ® [] 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water samples) and/or mitigative measures (i.e., clean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> ® ❑ 5,2 The report was inclusive (i.e. all information referenced was included in this report—report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> ® ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ® ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> ® ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By: Michael F. Escotto Reviewed Date: 4/12/2005 <br /> EHD 26.02-041 Page I of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br />