Laserfiche WebLink
There are no records of above ground, or under ground (AST/UST) storage tanks at the subject <br /> property address. This is illustrated on the attached GeoTracker Site Map, which shows no <br /> Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) or Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) tanks near ' � <br /> the site. The EHD Envisions Program denotes an Underground Storage Tank (UST) site at 3359 <br /> Fine Road, approximately three miles to the northeast of the property. This site can be considered <br /> crossgradient and impossible to impact the subject site due to the distances involved. Potential , <br /> environmental impacts from past, present or future facilities within a one mile radius is unknown at <br /> this time, but highly unlikely. <br /> Two sources of information which attempt to document and define on-site and surrounding past <br /> land use'were also utilized. The first is the use of aerial photographs. Aerial photographs of the <br /> subject area from 1970 through 1977 found on USDA Soil Maps show the property to be open, <br /> with ag production to the north. The USDA Map shows the soil to consist of a San Joaquin sandy <br /> loam (#236). Typically, these soil types are well drained with slow permeability and an underlying <br /> hardpan. There are sufficient soil "fines"to impede rapid percolation so treatment of septic <br /> effluent can occur before reaching the water table, unlike what would be encountered with a very <br /> sandy soil. The second source of information can be found on USGS maps. The property is 1 j <br /> located within the Peters Quadrangle map, which is found in the Appendix and shows only the <br /> referenced buildings. <br /> As stated by the Tivald's, only the herbicide Round-up® is applied to the homesite property during <br /> the spring and summer times of the year. No other pesticides are applied to any portion of the 9.24 3 3, <br /> acres. Therefore, an evaluation of environmental fate data for this specifically applied <br /> agrichemical residues as a nonpoint source of potential contamination was completed. In <br /> reviewing the enviromnental fate data of agrichemicals used today, most of the half-lives are <br /> extremely short and are measured in hours. <br /> The science of pesticide residues in soil, air, surface water and groundwater is extremely complex <br /> and variable. Environmental models that attempt to predict pesticide behavior and transport in the <br /> environment are beyond the scope of this investigation. However, pesticides with long half-lives <br /> that may have been used or drifted onto the property decades ago, primarily DDT, may be of a slight <br /> concern. DDT was used extensively throughout the agricultural fields of the San Joaquin Valley and <br /> degradates of DDT can be found in nearly all these soils. Previous Exposure Assessments made on <br /> typical San Joaquin Valley soils suggest an extremely low probability of adverse health effects from <br /> soil DDT/DDD and DDE concentrations (if the concentrations even exist). <br /> It can be reasonably concluded that any DDT, DDE and DDD concentrations that may be present <br /> on the property will continue to degrade as reported in the published environmental fate data. The <br /> environmental fate data for DDT and its degradates DDD and DDE are illustrated below: <br /> Page -4- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />