SU0000308 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No . 1 PC : 6-15-89 MS-89-59 �- Page 1 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny Minor Subdivision Application No . MS-89-59 based upon the inability to make Finding No . 1 . FINDINGS 1 . The proposed map is not consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans because the proposal is inconsistent with the intent of the AG-40 zone , which is the implementation zone for the General Plan designation of Agriculture . 2 . The design or improvement of the proposed division is con- sistent with applicable General and Specific Plans because the design and improvements meet the minimum standards con- tained in the General Plan and as reflected in the tentative map . 3 . The site is physically suitable for the type of development because the parcel is large enough to accommodate all of the proposed facilities and improvements. 4 . The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because the site , as proposed, is adequately sized to accommodate all required on-site services and meets the General Plan' s designated density for agricultural land. 5 . The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because an Initial Study prepared for the project did not identify any rare or endangered species on the site , nor did it identify any substantial , adverse environmental effects . 6 . The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed parcel is sized to adequately handle on-site sewage disposal , storm water retention, and domestic water supply. Z . The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access t?zrough or use of property within the pro- posed subdivision because no easements have been identified or required.