My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008520 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EIGHT MILE
>
4981
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000247
>
SU0008520 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:32 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 5:55:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0008520
PE
2625
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000247
STREET_NUMBER
4981
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
EIGHT MILE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
05926068
ENTERED_DATE
11/30/2010 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
4981 E EIGHT MILE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/29/2010 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\EIGHT MILE\4981\PA-1000247\SU0008520\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> -� ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 E Weber Avenue Yd Floor Stockton■CA 95202-2708 <br /> ' 209 468-3420 -Fac:(2 09) ■ <br /> ( ) ( 09 464-0138 Web:www.co.san-joayuin.ca.uslehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> I <br /> SITE LOCATION: 4981 E.EIGHT MILE ROAD,STOCKTON PA#: 10-247( UP) <br /> REPORT DATE: 5/28/2011 <br /> S = sufficient <br /> 1 = Insufficient San Joaquin County Development Title.Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 ' <br /> S 1 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ® � ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> 1 <br /> ®✓ ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS t <br /> ®✓ ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater;seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> ®,/ ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. I <br /> ®✓ ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> t <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ®✓ ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ®✓ ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ®f ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ®.✓ ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ®� ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> / Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formulalmodel,if applicable. <br /> ®✓ ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells,rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ®✓ ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ®✓ ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ®✓ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Michael F. Escotto Reviewed Date: 7/06/2011 <br /> l <br /> j <br /> { <br /> EHD 26-02-002 Pagel of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.