My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008656 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELDERBERRY
>
13021
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0900293
>
SU0008656 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:37 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:00:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0008656
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0900293
STREET_NUMBER
13021
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ELDERBERRY
STREET_TYPE
CT
City
LODI
APN
05805017
ENTERED_DATE
3/2/2011 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13021 N ELDERBERRY CT
RECEIVED_DATE
3/2/2011 12:00:00 AM
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\ELDERBERRY\13021\PA-0900293\SU0008656\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 11h' Xx' ` I ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> "i304 E Weber Avenue 3`1 Floor Stockton • CA 95202-2708 <br /> \(+ Vic% <br /> (209)468-3420- Fax:(209)464-0138 - Web:www.co.san-joaquin.ca.us/ehd <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PA#: 09-293(UP) <br /> [SITE LOCATION: 13021 N. ELDERBERRY CT., LODI <br /> REPORT DATE: 9/21/2011 <br /> S = Insufficent <br /> ient <br /> San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> 1 = InsufYcient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ®/ ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> N ✓ ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ® t/ ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> ® ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ®,/ ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ® / ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ® , ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> ® ,! ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ®,f ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ®✓/ ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ® ✓ ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Michael F. Escotto Reviewed Date: 12/01/2011 <br /> rnD 26-02-002 Page I of 2 Surface&Sub Cheuklw <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.