My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011022 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
7777
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1600160
>
SU0011022 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:20:00 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:03:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0011022
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1600160
STREET_NUMBER
7777
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95304-
APN
25014011
ENTERED_DATE
8/17/2016 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
7777 W ELEVENTH ST
RECEIVED_DATE
8/17/2016 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\ELEVENTH\7777\PA-1600160\SU0011022\SS_NL STUDY .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cP4u N SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> r ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> a <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton,CA 95202-3029 <br /> P Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> �/PORN <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> / PA#:SITE LOCATION: 7777 //fh�✓cr -� % REPOR DATE:X 'D30.) A1,1- <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105, Section 9-1105.2 <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> [X} ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> L <br /> ® ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> 0 ❑ 2.1 Description of:depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> g ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. `/ <br /> ® ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> / u <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ® ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> 9 <br /> ❑Q ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> c -7 <br /> ® ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. 3 <br /> r <br /> [) EJ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from Pe se sources to the project site. <br /> [n ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> � /7 <br /> ® ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 6 7 <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ® ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> H ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the proiect site. <br /> el <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ® ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑- ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: 6 e <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br /> 7/142003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.