My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008867 SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ENTERPRISE
>
17864
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1100135
>
SU0008867 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:43 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:07:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0008867
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1100135
STREET_NUMBER
17864
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
ENTERPRISE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
APN
22919010
ENTERED_DATE
8/22/2011 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17864 S ENTERPRISE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/22/2011 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\ENTERPRISE\17864\PA-1100135\SU0008867\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Op4UI C <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> z, ? ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> U: <br /> 600 East Main Street, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> Telephone:(209 468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.s ov.or ehd <br /> ...cP. P ) jg � <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: 1786 J $ r �x T PA#: P -00 / S <br /> 6 LS REPORT DATE: 7 <br /> = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient <br /> nt San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> I® ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ® ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> 0 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> ❑ ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ® ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ® ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ® ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnempore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> �( v^ i y. <br /> ❑ 3.6 Calcul>3Y�impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> 'l 12-- <br /> 4.0 <br /> Z4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> 12-- A3 <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern,at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: / �� Reviewed Date: S o L <br /> EHD 26-02 Page I of 2 Swfacc&Sun Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.