Laserfiche WebLink
1.) The Corral Areas: Freestall corrals theoretically contribute a comparatively small volume <br /> of nitrogen to the underlying soil due to the concrete-lined flush system which transports wastes <br /> from these corrals. In addition, since these corrals will be covered, there is virtually no hydraulic <br /> head from rainfall or other sources which would drive the ammonium and nitrate molecules <br /> continually deeper into the soil. Although the loafing barns will not have stalls, they will also be <br /> covered, with flushed feed alleys. <br /> Three factors are of significant importance to nitrogen contribution and the mitigation of the <br /> potential for nitrate impact from the open corrals. The first mitigating factor concerns the <br /> sloping of the open corrals to manage rainwater runoff. Each corral should be sloped 4%to 6% <br /> from the center to the ends to promote rainwater runoff into a sump. This water management <br /> technique reduces percolating water through the soil profile by preventing hydraulic head. Since <br /> the soil under the open corrals is composed of a tight silty clay material, infiltration and <br /> permeability is impeded. If ponding of water does occur in the open corrals, a sump pump may <br /> be used to transfer water into a drain and ultimately into the separation basins. <br /> The second factor reducing nitrate impact to the groundwater is the clay content of the soil down <br /> to 24 inches. The clay content percentage of a composite sample from grade to 24 inches was <br /> determined to be 26%by the hydrometer test, ASTM D422: Particle Size Analysis of Soils. <br /> The third mitigating factor of restricting downward migration of nitrogen in the open and loafing <br /> corrals is soil compaction from the animals. The hooves of the cows act essentially like a <br /> "shcepsfoot" soil compactor, creating a high density, low void space soil "cap" in the top six <br /> inches of the soil profile. Soil compaction attenuates the downward migration of nitrate <br /> molecules by reducing pore water permeability. <br /> 2.) Containment Structures: The wastewater system will consist of three separation basins and <br /> a holding pond. A certain percentage of nitrogen entering this system will volatilize in the form <br /> of ammonia(NH.) or be adsorbed onto the clay soil particles lining the ponds as ammonium <br /> (NH4). An investigation by Sutton, (1983) suggests that a nitrogen loss from a holding pond <br /> system can range from 70%to 80%. Ammonia volatilization occurs from urine and manure <br /> solids transfer to the ponds and during pond storage. All containment structures will be tested <br /> for clay content by the hydrometer method for compliance with liner requirements by the <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board. The ponds can be considered predominately anaerobic. <br /> An aerobic environment is required for nitrate conversion to occur. Significant conversion can <br /> only take place when the pond and basins are allowed to dry out. When the manure is eventually <br /> cleaned-out or draglined, it should be done as soon as feasible after the water is pumped to <br /> impede nitrate conversion from occurring. <br /> The second issue regarding the containment structures is the natural process of denitrification. <br /> This process takes place only in anaerobic environments such as saturated clay soils where the <br /> pore space volume is extremely small and pore space oxygen is readily consumed. It has been <br /> documented that nitrate concentrations in groundwater are relatively low around wastewater <br /> holding ponds that are composed of high clay content soils. Because of the tight indigenous on- <br /> site soils, denitrification may be promoted. <br /> 6 <br /> valfey Aq PPsearch <br />