Laserfiche WebLink
Recommendations <br /> Action <br /> i It is recommended that the Planning Commission: <br /> 1. Deny Variance Application No. PA-0900187 because of the inability to make Findings 1 and 2 <br /> k contained in the,staff report. <br /> Findings <br /> Development Title Section 9-827.5 states that prior to approving an application for a Variance, the Review <br /> Authority shall find that all of the following are true: <br /> 1. Because of the s' ecial circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, <br /> location, or surroundings, the strict application of the regulation deprives the property of privileges <br /> enjoyed by other;property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. <br /> Due to the location of the Stockton East Water District Canal,the project site does <br /> have a special circumstance. However,this finding cannot be made because the <br /> privilege the applicant is requesting is for the subdivision of the property. This site <br /> does not have that privilege. Other properties within the same vicinity and with the <br /> same zoning classification,cannot create(two) 2 parcels from less than 320 acres. <br /> The parcel is 160 acres in size and is relatively flat agricultural land of similar size and <br /> shape to,the neighboring parcels.There are several parcels <br /> to the west and south of <br /> the project site that have very similar topographic circumstances,such as the course <br /> the Stockton East Water District canal takes as it passes through these parcels in a <br /> similar iiianner as the project site.These parcels are under the same zone <br /> classification; and are governed by the same privileges and limitations,based on their <br /> property size. Subdividing the parcel does not alter access to the site, end the site is <br /> not situated in a way where the vacant portion of the parcel to the south cannot be <br /> utilized by the applicant. <br /> 2. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the <br /> limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. <br /> This finding cannot be made because granting this Variance will constitute a grant of <br /> special-privileges that are not enjoyed by the surrounding properties, as the AG -160 <br /> zones does notp rovide for the creation of two (2) lots on 170 acres. The zone <br /> minimuiti for the creation of new lots is 160 acres. There are no limitations upon this <br /> property that are not also on the properties in the vicinity and zone. In addition, <br /> adjacent to the project site to the west and south are parcels of 358.0, 278.0 and 152 <br /> acres respectively, in which the Stockton East Water District canal traverses in a <br /> similar manner as the proposed project site. These parcels are under the same zone <br /> classification;and are governed by the same privileges and limitations based on their <br /> property;size. The surrounding parcels are consistent with the zone minimum in size, <br /> and have the same zone classification and General Plan designation as the project <br /> site. AII.,properties in the vicinity are required to abide by the regulations within the <br /> General_Plan and the Development Title. <br /> San Joaquin County' PA-09001871Foothill/Murphy <br /> Community Development Page 6 <br /> i <br /> k <br /> i ' <br />