Laserfiche WebLink
l <br /> Ms. Mo Hatef <br /> Community Development Department <br /> September 13, 2006 <br /> Page 2 <br /> significantly more study. <br /> 2. There appears to be no provision in the plan or in the May 31, 2006 <br /> traffic study for screening (i.e., masonry wall, landscaping, etc.) <br /> between the proposed 60 foot roadway extending along the south <br /> side of the"Lockeford Vistas"project and beside the houses to be <br /> built on three of our lots. Since the proposed roadway will run <br /> immediately adjacent to the sides of the houses to be built on our <br /> lots, the roadway could present a substantial nuisance. This issue <br /> should be addressed. <br /> 3. There is a proposed pedestrian access on the western edge of the <br /> "Lockeford Vistas" subdivision that seems to envision pedestrians <br /> exiting the subdivision to an unspecified,unimproved area or to <br /> existing private properties. It seems to me that the plan for <br /> pedestrian access needs to be better specified and laid out in <br /> purposeful fashion. If the concept is that children going to the <br /> nearby elementary school would utilize this pedestrian access to <br /> get to the proposed southern roadway, the importance of a well <br /> thought-out plan for the 60 foot roadway and its intersection with <br /> Tully road seems even more important. <br /> I look forward to receiving the staff analysis and recommendations and would <br /> appreciate any thoughts your Department or Public Works might be willing to <br /> offer as to my concerns. <br /> Thank you for your gracious cooperation. <br /> 'fiery truly <br /> P. GAR CASSEL <br /> P.GC:g m <br /> 00056073.WPD <br />