Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> k'q KLE1NFELDER <br /> to the Logs of Borings is presented on Plate 5. Detailed description s of the subsurface <br /> conditions encountered during our field investigation are presented on the Logs of Borings, <br /> Plates 6 through 17. <br /> The Soil Survey of San Joaquin County, California published by the U.S. Department of <br /> Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (1992) maps six distinct soil series within the study <br /> area. The soil names and symbols, along with soil attributes, are given in the table below. <br /> [ 7 <br /> General Percolation A�arlabe Water "' Organic <br /> Map SO11 f< s �x t LS§ # i'g� <br /> ,, for Septtc , ; Capacity, pR Content i <br /> Symbol Name <br /> tion Fields _.�. ,rncbcsl�nch ...,� :. :... ercent <br /> 170 Hicksville Severe 0.11 -0.20 5.6-7.8 1 -3 <br /> 189 Kingdon Moderate 0.10-0.16 5.6-- 8.4 1 -3 <br /> 216 Ramoth Severe 0.08- 0.15 5.6-7.3 . <1 <br /> 220 Redding Severe 0.04-0.14- 5.1 -6.5 <2 . <br /> 221 Redding Severe 0.04-0.14 5.1 -6.5 <2 <br /> 256 I Tokay Slight 0.10-0.15 1 ,6.1 - 8.4 .1 -3 <br /> v 6. PERCOLATION TESTING <br /> Shallow and deep percolation test holes were installed in each of the proposed parcels with the <br /> same drill rig used for the soil profile boring, only equipped with a 6-inch diameter auger. The <br /> approximate percolation test locations are presented on Plate 2. Following drilling, the sides of <br /> the holes were scored, and significant loose material was removed from the bottom of the a <br /> holes. Test holes were originally drilled and prepared on March 17 and 18, 2005. However, <br /> due to heavy rains, soil washed into the test holes and the percolation tests were not completed. j <br /> Our drill rig.returned to the site on May 10, 2005 and cleaned out and reset the percolation <br /> holes in accordance with SJCEHD criteria. Approximately 2 inches of fine gravel was placed <br /> at the bottom of each test hole. <br /> he percolation tests were run on May 11 and 12 2005 ill acggLdance wilb ac ad pidelines. <br /> using clear potable water. The tests holes were resoaked with at least 12 inches f e at <br /> least 24 hours prior to testing. During the three days of testing the skies were overcast, the <br /> temperatures were cool, and there were periods ofrainfall. The approximate depth of each <br /> percolation test below existing site grade is shown on the following table. The holes did not <br /> exhibit sloughing or caving. From a fixed reference point, a marked location on the side of <br /> PVC pipe inserted into each hole, the drop in water levels were measured in approximate 30- <br /> minute intervals for four hours, refilling as necessary to maintain the prescribed amount of <br /> water over the.gravel (SJCEHD Procedure #2). As specified, the last two 30-minute readings } <br /> were recorded under the observation of a representative.from the SJCEHD and were used to <br /> calculate the percolation rate in minutes per inch. A summary of the percolation test results are <br /> presented in the following table. The initial. ercolation tests in L d. On <br /> the morning of May 18 2005 our drill rig returned to the s' _,,,iataUed-an„a im al deep <br /> percolation test hole in each of these lots with the same equipment previously used. Upon <br /> 55208.GO1/ST05R644 June 1,2005 <br /> O 2005 Kleinfelder,Inc. Page 4 of 9 <br />