SU0005732 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Recommendations Action It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Approve the Negative Declaration; and 2. Approve the Revisions of Approved Actions application for approved Use Permit No. UP-00-10 based on the revised Findings and subject to the revised Conditions of Approval contained in the staff report. Revised Findings 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, standards, and maps of the General Plan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific Plan, and Special Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. This finding can be made because agricultural processing-food manufacturing is consistent with the AIG General Plan designation and may be conditionally permitted with a Use Permit in the Ag-40 zone. The changes to the facility proposed in the Revisions of Approved Actions presents no significant General Plan policy issues. 2. Adequate utilities, roadway improvements, sanitation, water supply, drainage, and other necessary facilities have been provided, and the proposed improvements are properly related to existing and proposed roadways. This finding can be made because even with the changes proposed in the Revsions of Approved Actions, the site can accommodate a well, septic system, and drainage facilities. In addition, the project has public road frontage on South Frederick Avenue. 3. T^e site is physically suitable for the type of development and for the intensity of development. This finding can be made because the revised site plan shows that there is sufficient area for the facilities, parking, circulation, and to place and expand Building 11 in compliance with County standards. 4. Issuance of the permit will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be injurious to the property or improvements of adjacent properties. This finding can be made because the Initial Study prepared for the Revisions of Approved Actions for UP-00-10 found that the project would not result in any significant, adverse environmental impacts. 5. The use is compatible with adjoining land uses. This finding can be made because the original Initial Study prepared for the project and the Initial Study prepared for the Revisions of Approved Actions found that the use would not be incompatible with surrounding land uses. The surrounding land is used for agricultural purposes. San Joaquin County UP-00-10\Gikas Community Development Page 4