Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIRN,.iNTS ORDER NO. 1.d -13- <br /> GOLDSTONE LAND COMPANY,LLC AND KURT KAUTZ <br /> BEAR CREEK WINERY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Winery Background <br /> Analyte Units Wastewater Groundwater2 Limits <br /> Chloride Mg/L 3-250 33 33 <br /> Sodium Mg/L 35-200 55.5 56 <br /> TDS Mg/L 80-2,900 671 671 <br /> Nitrate as N Mg/L 0.5-4.83 22.7 10 <br /> J The average for both crush and non-crush sdasons. <br /> 2 Background quality defined by the average concentrations of samples from Well MW-2. <br /> a Organic nitrogen compounds can vary from I to 40 mg/1. <br /> 67. The discharge is nonhazardous, but exhibits characteristics of"designated waste,"as the <br /> concentrations of some waste constituents when treated, stored, and applied to land have potential <br /> for causing exceedances of water quality objectives or adversely affecting beneficial uses. The <br /> discharge contains decomposable waste constituents (e.g., organic carbon and nutrient <br /> compounds) and inorganic dissolved solids in concentrations that are greater than water quality <br /> objectives. <br /> 68. The discharge must be categorized as designated waste because of these constituents and subjected <br /> to the full containment provisions of Title 27 unless it can be demonstrated that constituents of <br /> concern, afterrelease, are effectively and consistently removed by attenuation in the soil profile <br /> and the discharge fully compliant with the Basin Plan. For waste applied to the land application <br /> area, it means a demonstration that controlled land treatment removes waste decomposable <br /> constituents within the LTU and, for those not totally decomposable,passes through <br /> concentrations that will cause no degradation of groundwater. <br /> 69. The waste that is discharged to land contains TDS well in excess of governing background quality <br /> and these constituents are not effectively removed by the LTU. The practical demonstration of <br /> removal of dissolved solids as projected by the Discharger has not been demonstrated as required <br /> for an LTU. The Discharger has not established the design LTU depth that is dependent upon <br /> crop. The Discharger has not established an evaluation monitoring program,unsaturated zone <br /> monitoring program, or water quality protection standards for each waste constituent. Inorganic <br /> dissolved solids can be effectively controlled by means of source control, treatment, or <br /> containment. Source control includes best management practices of selective and judicious <br /> chemical use (e.g., potassium-based cleaning solutions instead of sodium-based) and waste stream <br /> isolation or segregation where possible(in particular separate handling of high strength <br /> wastewater, ion exchange regeneration brine, and boiler blowdown). Treatment technology <br /> includes reverse osmosis and ion exchange applied to the wastewater, but we have no evidence <br /> that any have been evaluated or applied to the discharge. Containment technology includes Title <br /> 27 prescriptive standards where appropriate,but there is no evidence that these were considered <br /> for implementation for all applicable waste streams. <br /> 70. The Discharger has not proposed a project that will ensure no degradation for constituents that <br /> already exceed water quality objectives and therefore the project is inconsistent with the Basin <br /> Plan and cannot be exempted from Title 27 standards. <br /> V:ISan JoaquN Non15\SWI\OhienTProjcn Filcz\B�Cr«k\WpRdoc <br />