Laserfiche WebLink
} <br /> Ga&g1cj1TccWcs1xc. Page 4 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No. 750.2 <br /> i <br /> 'April 10,2003 <br /> +Lv <br /> cleaner before and between uses. Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect <br /> all samples and were changed with each sampling event. <br /> A.chain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> i field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track their movement and ensure their <br /> L` integrity. <br /> The purge water was placed in a properly labeled 55 gallon DOT approved container and <br /> stored on site until its proper disposition can be arranged. <br /> Groundwater monitoring field logs are included in Appendix C. <br /> 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br /> Theroundwater samples collected on December 30 2002 were delivered to Sherwood <br /> -• g p o <br /> Labs of Hilmar, California (Department of Health Services Certification No. 1400), for <br /> al C analysis. <br />{ The groundwater samples were analyzed for: <br /> • Benzene,Toluene,Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene (BTEX)by EPA method 8020/8015 <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G)by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> i <br /> Additional samples were sent to Entech Analytical Labs, Inc. from Sherwood Labs for the <br /> analysis of- <br /> • Fuel oxygenated compounds (MTBE, DIPS, ETBE, TAME & TBA) by EPA method <br /> �1 8260 <br /> The detection limits for the above analyses are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A and the lab <br /> data are presented in Appendix B. <br /> As required under A132886, the laboratory data was submitted electronically to GeoTracker <br /> on Aprill0, 2003, with confirmation number 7463127553. <br /> 4 <br /> L4 i <br /> 2.0 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Findings <br /> The results of the groundwater sample analyses show the following: <br /> • Well MW-1 has only shown trace levels of Xylene for the last two monitoring events. <br /> • Figure 4 illustrates groundwater elevation and TPH-G concentrations in MW-1 versus <br /> �.-. g <br /> time. <br />