Laserfiche WebLink
-- .22/2005 09:28 FAX 209 9480621 - R002 <br /> KLEINFELDER <br /> An nrrylvee uwe,ed cumrany <br /> File No.32585.G01 <br /> September 22,2003 <br /> Ms. Stacey Griffetb <br /> 11875 East Mayers Road <br /> Acampo, CA 95220 <br /> Subject: DISCUSSION OF PERCOLATION TEST P-17 <br /> 18882 E. GAWNE ROAD <br /> STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA <br /> Dear Ms. Grifleth: <br /> As requested by Mr. Mikc Huggins of San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD), <br /> we present this letter discussing Test Hole #1 at Percolation Test P-17 performed on July 8, 2003 as part of <br /> the soil suitability study dated August 13, 2003. Mr. Eduardo Rodriguez performed the percolation test, and <br /> Mr.Michael Escatto was the SJCEHD inspector. <br /> The following is based on a discussion with Mr. Rodriguez as well as a review of the percolation test data <br /> sheets from July 8, 2003. The two percolation tests inspected prior to P-17 were P-8 and P-1. The final <br /> readings for Test Hole 41 of the previous two tests showed that all the water had percolated out of the test <br /> holes. As Percolation Test P-8 was inspected, Mr. Escatto wrote "Empty"next to the final reading for Test <br /> Hole#1 and instructed Mr.Rodriguez to specifically state when a given hole is empty. Upon completion of <br /> Percolation Test P-1, Mr. Rodriguez wrote"Empty" next to the last reading of Test Hole #1 as instructed- <br /> As previously stated, the percolation test inspected following P-8 and P-1 was P-17. Based on the water <br /> level readings at 3:40 and 4:10,the test hole was clearly not empty. In addition,the test hole was not refilled <br /> after the reading at 3:40- However, as test P-17 was inspected, it appears that a misunderstanding occurred <br /> regarding the previously inspected Percolation Tcsts P-8 and P-1. Believing that Mr. Rodriguez had stated <br /> that the test holo was empty on the last two readings (Mr. Rodriguez referring to tests P-8 and P-1), Mr. <br /> Eseotto incorrectly wrote "Empty" next to the final two readings of Percolation Test P-17 and recorded <br /> below his signature that the two readings were empty- We note that English is Mr. Rodriguez's second <br /> language. <br /> In conclusion, due to a misunderstanding between Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Escatto, Test Hole #1 of <br /> Percolation Test P-17 was incorrectly recorded as being empty. However,it is our opinion that the numerical <br /> readings for the test as well as the recorded percolation rate of 14.7 minutes per inch are correct. <br /> We trust that this letter meets your needs at this time. If you have any questions,please contact our office. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> KLEINFELDER <br /> R J.Olsen,C.E. <br /> Staff Engineer <br /> RJO:Ir cc:Mr.Mike Huggins—SJCEHD <br /> ST031.530 W 2003 Klonf0der,Inc. <br /> KLEINFELDER 3825 kaet Myrtle street,SLockton,CA 95205-4794 (209)948.1345 (209)948-0621 fax <br />