SU0012397 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, Ms.Alisa Goulart San Joaquin County Community Development Department February 11,2020 Page 2 Endangered Species Act(CESA)(Fish and Game Code,§2050 et seq.),the Project proponent may seek related take authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Proponent:Dharm Singh/Sukhjit"Tony"Singh Location: 16151 W.Grant Line Road in the City of Tracy,San Joaquin County,California, Assessor's Parcel Number(s)209-190-33 and 209-190-40.The Project is located on the north side of W.Grant Line Road,985 feet east of S.Hansen Road,northwest of(lie City of Tracy, Timeframe:Two(2)construction phases over four(4)years. Description:The Project proposes to expand an existing religious assembly from a maximum of 170 members to a maximum of 700 members in two phases over four years.Phase 1 includes the construction of a 28,965-square-foot(sf)assembly hall,a 250 sf well house,a 700 sf water pump house for fire,a 6,453 sf porch and hallway structure to connect the proposed assembly hall with a future social hall,and the conversion of an existing 6,150 sf agricultural building Into a storage building.Phase 2 includes the construction of a two-story,17,715 sf social hall with a kitchen and dining area,and an upstairs area for retreat and guest preachers. The site plan proposes three driveways off West Grant Line Road.Currently,the religious assembly utilizes,and will continue to utilize,a 4,920 sf assembly hall,a 2,500 sf office and visitor's quarters,a 1,409 sf garage and office,a 4,250 sf parsonage,and a 96 sf storage building. COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist San Joaquin County Community Development Department in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project's significant,or potentially significant,direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife(biological) resources.Editorial comments or other suggestions may also be included to improve the document. Based on the Project's avoidance of significant impacts on biological resources with implementation of mitigation measures,CDFW concludes that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the Project. Comment 1:Revision needed to mitigate impacts from Project phasing to less-than- significant The IS/MND does not include a description of timeframe or period(luring which construction will occur.Project activities may have additional significant biological impacts due to Project phasing over time.Phasing and the additional impacts from phasing are not discussed,analyzed,or mitigated for in the IS/MND.Projects that include multiple phases with different sections or parcels built out at different time periods or phasing that includes whole-site grading with separate sections or parcels developed at later dates have impacts over a period longer than one year.This delay in full build out of a Project allows wildlife to utilize resources that develop post-grading on vacant sections or parcels.These resources include, but are not limited to;