Laserfiche WebLink
17 <br /> Feeding 200 people with a chef from Italy from a commercial kitchen is not <br /> compatible with the ambiance of this San Joaquin County agricultural area, it is not <br /> "accessory or subordinate to" wine production, and it is absolutely out of character for the <br /> neighborhood in which it seeks legitimization. <br /> D.2. Reason #2 Why the "Marketing Events" Condition Should Be Modified <br /> or Removed: The St. Jorge Winery Business is Being Marketed as <br /> Providing Private Party and Public Entertainment Services, Not Wine- <br /> Related Services <br /> All of the above--the numbers of people, the amphitheater music and the food <br /> prepared commercially in-house, the wide party-range of activities and other <br /> accommodations advertised, with "all the necessary attention to detail," and most of all the <br /> `full service event destination" marketing theme, show clearly that what the St. Jorge <br /> Winery offers are private party and public entertainment services, not wine-related <br /> services. <br /> This scale of activity is not what the Vierras are permitted for, nor can they be <br /> under current San Joaquin County law. <br /> D. 3. Reason#3 Why the "Marketing Events" Condition Should Be Modified <br /> or Removed: The Proper Measurement Should Be Setback, Not <br /> Property Line <br /> Measuring an impact at the line of the property creating the impact has no relation <br /> to the impact beyond the property line. Impacts shouldrp operlX be measured where they <br /> occur, not where they are created. Here, the noise, the light and glare, the traffic, the <br /> inability to have "quiet enjoyment" or simply go to sleep in one's own home, and all the <br /> impacts necessarily associated with this proposed project will necessarily aggregate on the <br /> Isolas property most immediately, and then to the other nearby neighbors. These impacts <br /> should properly be measured on the various neighbors' properties where they take on <br /> reality in peoples'lives,not merely at the Vierras' property line where they begin. <br /> E. Condition 1. k., "Noise" <br /> The condition reads: <br /> "NOISE: Implementation of the following recommendations shall be provided and <br /> comply with the following pursuant to the noise study prepared by J.C. Brennan <br /> and Associates dated August 2, 2012: <br /> (1) Conduct periodic noise measurements, during event at the Control <br />