Laserfiche WebLink
2. Adopt special standards for residential areas, setbacks and exceptions, lot coverage, comer lots, and <br /> cluster,alley, and garden court lots, as follows: <br /> a. For R/M subdivisions with typical lots less than 3,600 square feet, require that at least one model will <br /> be a maximum of 1,400 square feet. <br /> b. Increase allowable front yard porch encroachments from 5 feet to 8 feet in the R/L and from 5 feet to <br /> 6 feet in the R/M. <br /> a c. Require a developer who proposes to develop a subdivision with lots of a typical area of less than <br /> 3,600 square feet in the R/M designation to apply for a Model Home Master Plan containing certain <br /> required features(e.g., a minimum of three floor plans,with one plan not exceeding 1,400 square feet <br /> of Livable Area,whichever is more). <br /> 4 d. Reduce the minimum lot size from 3,000 square feet to 2,000 square feet for subdivisions in the R/M <br /> designation. <br /> e. Reduce the minimum lot width requirement for lots of 3,600 square feet in the R/M designation from <br /> 40 feet to 32 feet. <br /> f Delete the minimum lot size and lot width requirements for residential dwellings in the R/M <br /> �- designation, except as set forth above(see 2d and 2e). <br /> g. Allow for a percentage of homes in the R/M designation to have a third level,provided the third level <br /> is contained within the roof structure.The percentage of homes allowing this third level is not to <br /> exceed 40% for each individual builder project. <br /> h. Increase the building coverage(i.e.,the percentage of a lot permitted to be occupied by buildings)for <br /> one-story homes in the R/L designation from 40%to 50%. <br /> i. Increase the building coverage for residential dwellings in the R/MH or R/H designations from 60% <br /> to 65%. <br /> J. Exclude the area of single-story porches that wrap from the front to the side of the house from <br /> building coverage calculations in the R/M and R/L designations,provided such porches do not exceed <br /> 20%of total building coverage(excluding garages)and do not encroach on setback requirements. <br /> ., 3. A summary of the provisions of the Text Amendment relating to setback requirements is provided below. <br /> The proposed Text Amendment would: <br /> a. Replace the heading"Collector and Local Streets"with the heading"Front Setback." <br /> b. Delete the 45-degree clear setback requirement(i.e.,the height of the structure determines the setback <br /> distance)from an arterial street, and make the setback from an arterial street the same as the front <br /> setback(except as specified). <br /> c. Decrease the front setback for one-story homes in the R/L designation from 20 feet to 15 feet. <br /> d. Decrease the front setback for homes on lots that are less than 3,600 square feet in the R/M <br /> designation from 15 feet to 10 feet. <br /> College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR EDAW <br /> San Joaquin County 3-13 Project Description <br />