Laserfiche WebLink
Irrigation Water <br /> BBID would remain as the irrigation water purveyor to the project site. Because BBID's water canals on the <br /> College Park site would be filled/removed in the course of project development,BBID and the project applicant <br /> are negotiating alternative methods through which BBID can deliver irrigation water on a long-term basis for use <br /> at Delta College and the community park. The ultimate methods for continued delivery of irrigation water to the <br /> project site would be outlined in a farm irrigation and drainage plan,which would be submitted with the tentative <br /> tract map for the proposed project(MacKay&Somps 2004a). <br /> r <br /> BBID maintains two irrigation canals, canal 120 and canal 155,that cross the project site in a northwest-to- <br /> southeast trending direction(see Figure 4.5-1).These irrigation canals supply the existing agricultural operations <br /> on the project site as well as agricultural operations downstream and to the southeast of the project site.Further <br /> descriptions of these canals are included in Section,4.2,"Land Use and Agriculture."As described above,BBID <br /> would need to construct new pipelines to convey irrigation water to Delta College and the community park. In <br /> addition,BBID would continue to provide service to the area southeast of the project site. Canal 155 would need <br /> to be constructed through the project site to serve the community college and the community park and be <br /> connected to the existing canal on the southeast side of Mountain House Parkway.The precise location for the <br /> infrastructure would be outlined in a farm irrigation and drainage plan that would be submitted with the tentative <br /> ` tract map for the proposed project.However, a preliminary location of the proposed BBID irrigation water line <br /> has been identified for the project site,as shown in Figure 4.5-1. <br /> Groundwater <br /> As discussed above,BBID maintains two irrigation canals that cross the project site which supply agricultural <br /> operations.These irrigation canals would be filled or removed through the course of development. Concern was <br /> raised about how removal of the two irrigation canals would affect existing groundwater levels in the project <br /> study area. As irrigation water flows through the two irrigation canals,a certain portion of water seeps into the <br /> ground thereby assisting with recharge of groundwater resources. As a result of this concern, a field <br /> reconnaissance of the irrigation canals was conducted by Wallace-Kuhl&Associates on February 5,2005 <br /> (Appendix n.During the reconnaissance,the irrigation canals were found to be predominantly dry with some <br /> standing water in small areas. The canals were observed to be unlined throughout their lengths and appeared to <br /> be well maintained and free of any significant vegetation. <br /> Depth to groundwater was measured by two piezometers located adjacent to the canals on April 7 and May 26, <br /> 2004. Specifically,piezometer P-2 is located adjacent to canal 155 and piezometer P-3 is located adjacent to canal <br /> 120.Piezometer P-2 measured the depth to groundwater at 32.6 feet below the surface on April 7,2004 and on <br /> May 26,2004 measured the depth to groundwater at 31.4 feet.Piezometer P-3 measured the depth to groundwater <br /> at 32.1 feet below the surface on April 7,2004 and on May 26, 2004 measured the depth to groundwater at 14.5 <br /> feet.These depths indicate a 1.2 foot rise and a 17.6 foot rise in groundwater elevation April 7th and May 26th. <br /> According to BBID(Flores 2005)the regional use of irrigation water has declined significantly over the past <br /> several years. Specifically,water deliveries south of Mountain House Creek for canal 120 dropped from 1,779.36 <br /> acre-feet in 2003 to 596.61 acre-feet in 2004.Along with this,deliveries to canal 155 dropped from 764.88 acre- <br /> feet in 2003 to 162.17 acre-feet in 2004. <br /> Consequently,impacts to groundwater recharge occurring as a result of restricting water to canals 120 and 155 <br /> have already occurred for the most part and are reflected in the current groundwater conditions of local wells <br /> including Grant Line Village wells. In addition,BBID would be supplying irrigation water to new residential and <br /> commercial customers in the project vicinity, including the community college campus. It is anticipated that <br /> decline in local groundwater recharge from canals 120 and 155 would be more than offset by recharge from <br /> residential and commercial landscape irrigation. <br /> College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR EDAW <br /> San Joaquin County 4.5-3 Public Utilities <br />