Laserfiche WebLink
(Figure 4.10-1)that could provide suitable denning sites for a fox moving through the area. Extensive surveys <br /> conducted in the 1990s did not provide any conclusive evidence that kit fox use dens in this area,but it has been <br /> over 10 years since these surveys were conducted. More recently,there have been several reports of San Joaquin — <br /> kit fox within a few miles of the College Park site(CNDDB 2004). Therefore,it is possible that this species <br /> could inhabit the College Park site. <br /> MHMP Section 7.3.4 includes a requirement designed to protect San Joaquin kit fox through implementation of _ <br /> pre-construction and construction protocols. In addition,the Delta College EIR Mitigation Measure 4.11-3(a) <br /> includes construction of a fence setback at least 100 feet from the Delta—Mendota Canal to allow wildlife <br /> movement along this corridor. The MMP protocols were developed in the early 1990s,and additional USFWS <br /> protocols have been adopted since then to project San Joaquin kit fox(USFWS 1999). For example,MI-IMP <br /> protocols allow pre-construction surveys to be conducted up to 6 months before the start of grading activities, <br /> whereas USFWS protocols require surveys to be conducted no later than 30 days before project activity. In <br /> addition,there is no assurance that the protocols would be implemented because the MHMP states the protocol <br /> shall only be followed to the extent possible. It also indicates the measure only applies until 50%of the <br /> community south of Byron Road is built. This requirement could be satisfied before any construction occurs at <br /> the College Park site. Therefore,the MHMP may not require any kit fox protection measures during <br /> implementation of College Park and a significant impact could occur. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.10.9: Biological Resources--Conversion of San Joaquin Kit Fox Habitat and Possible <br /> Occupied Den Destruction <br /> The College Park developers shall request coverage under the SJMSCP,and fees shall be paid in the amount <br /> determined by SJCOG during the application and review process for each project under College Park. Because <br /> the entire College Park site is located within the SJMSCP's Central/Southwest Transition Zone,the following <br /> SJMSCP incidental take avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented for all projects: <br /> Pre-construction surveys shall be conducted 2 weeks to 30 days before commencement of ground disturbance. <br /> Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. If the surveys identify potential dens(potential dens are <br /> defined as burrows at least 4 inches in diameter that open up within 2 feet),potential den entrances shall be dusted <br /> for 3 calendar days to register track of any San Joaquin kit fox present. If no San Joaquin kit fox activity is <br /> identified,potential dens may be destroyed. If San Joaquin kit fox activity is identified,then dens shall be <br /> monitored to determine if occupation is by an adult fox only or is a natal den(natal dens usually have multiple <br /> openings). If the den is occupied by an adult only,the den may be destroyed when the adult fox has moved or is <br /> temporarily absent. If the den is a natal den, a buffer zone of 250 feet shall be maintained around the den until the _ <br /> biologist determines that the den has been vacated. <br /> Where San Joaquin kit fox are identified,the provisions of the Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the _ <br /> San Joaquin Kit Fox before or during Ground Disturbance(USFWS 1999b)shall apply(except that pre- <br /> construction survey protocols shall remain as established in the above paragraph).These standards include <br /> provisions for educating construction workers regarding the kit fox,keeping heavy equipment operating at safe <br /> speeds,checking construction pipes for kit fox occupation during construction,and similar low-or no-cost activities. — <br /> Implementation of the above mitigation measure would reduce potential impacts of habitat conversion and <br /> possible destruction of occupied kit fox dens to a less-than-significant level. — <br /> IMPACT Biological Resources—Loss or Alteration of Jurisdictional Waters of the United States. The proposed <br /> 4.10-10 project could result in loss or alteration of jurisdictional waters of the United States. The MHMP includes <br /> measures designed to preserve and compensate for loss of such wetlands,but it does not specify measures <br /> to identify habitats under jurisdiction of USACE or DFG. A significant impact could occur. <br /> EDAW College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR <br /> Biological Resources 4.10-40 San Joaquin County <br />