Laserfiche WebLink
4.12.2 REGULATORY BETTING <br /> FEDERAL REGULATIONS <br /> Criteria Air Pollutants <br /> Air pollutants subject to federal ambient standards are referred to as"criteria"pollutants because the EPA <br /> publishes criteria documents to justify the choice of standards. An important reason for air quality standards is <br /> the protection of sensitive receptors. The standards for criteria pollutants are identified in Table 4.12-2. <br /> The EPA has been charged with implementing national air quality programs. EPA's air quality mandates are <br /> drawn primarily from the federal Clean Air Act(CAA),which was signed into law in 1970. Congress <br /> substantially amended the CAA in 1977 and 1990. The CAA required EPA to establish primary and secondary <br /> NAAQS for criteria pollutants,which are shown in Table 4.12-1. These standards are designed to protect people <br /> who are sensitive to respiratory distress,such as asthmatics,the elderly, children,people already weakened by <br /> other disease or illness,and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. The NAAQS were originally = <br /> established for six air pollution constituents and have been periodically revised. The CAA also required states <br /> exceeding the NAAQS to prepare a State Implementation Plan(SIP) showing how they would meet the standards <br /> by December 1987. The CAA Amendments of 1977(1977 CAAAs)and 1990(1990 CAAAs)made major _ <br /> changes in deadlines for compliance with the NAAQS and required revisions to the SIPS. Sanctions were <br /> imposed on states that failed to implement an acceptable plan; these consisted of denial of federal highway funds <br /> and more stringent requirements for major stationary sources. <br /> The 1990 CAAAs require that designated agencies in any area that does not meet the NAAQS prepare a plan(SIP <br /> update) demonstrating the steps that will be taken to bring the area into compliance. These SIP requirements vary <br /> depending on the degree of severity to which an area is in nonattainment. The 1990 CAAAs also revised the <br /> federal statute for achieving attainment of NAAQS and provided amew set of guidelines and planning processes <br /> for carrying out the requirements of the amendments. Provisions of Section 182,which relates to 03 <br /> nonettamment areas,and Section 187,which relates to CO nonattainment areas, emphasize strategies for reducing y <br /> vehicle miles traveled. Section 182 requires submission of a plan revision that adopts specific enforceable <br /> transportation control measures to offset any growth in emissions from growth in vehicle miles traveled or <br /> number of vehicle trips in such an area to meet statutory requirements for demonstrating periodic emission .Y <br /> reduction requirements. <br /> The conformity provisions of the CAA require that federal agencies contribute to instead of j eopardizing efforts to <br /> achieve the NAAQS. The EPA required that transportation-related federal discretionary actions in 1993 and <br /> transportation projects receiving federal funds in 1997 demonstrate conformity to the approved SIP. The SIP <br /> represents a series of attainment plans by air basin that are periodically updated by air districts in consultation Y <br /> with regional transportation planning agencies. <br /> Hazardous Air Pollutants <br /> Title III of the CAA requires the EPA to promulgate National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants <br /> (NESHAP)for certain categories of sources which emit one or more pollutants identified as Hazardous Air <br /> Pollutants(HAPS)(termed"TACs"in California). Emission standards may differ among"major sources"and <br /> "area sources"of HAPS. Major sources are defined as stationary sources with potential to emit over 10 tons per <br /> year of any HAP or over 25 tons per year of any combination of HAPs; all other sources are considered area <br /> sources. Promulgation of the emission standards involves two phases. In the first phase(1992 through 2000),the a <br /> EPA developed technology-based emission standards designed to produce the maximum emission reduction <br /> achievable. These standards are generally referred to as requiring Maximum Achievable Control Technology <br /> (MACT). For area sources,the standards may be different,based on generally available control technology. In F <br /> the second phase(2001 through 2008), EPA is required to promulgate health risk-based emissions standards <br /> EDAW College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR <br /> Air Quality 4.12-10 San Joaquin County <br />