My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004916
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
18353
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500142
>
SU0004916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 9:43:57 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 10:44:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004916
PE
2638
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500142
STREET_NUMBER
18353
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
3/17/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18353 W GRANT LINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/15/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\G\GRANT LINE\18353\PA-0500142\SU0004916\COLLEGE PRK SP III.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
865
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Detailed Analysis <br /> The detailed analysis utilized the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model and focused on the noise levels at <br /> specific receptors located along the five roadway segments passing the screening analysis discussed above.The <br /> detailed analysis included as inputs: <br /> ► the receptors' distance from the modeled road; <br /> ► the proposed widening of the road where applicable(Grant Line Road); and <br /> ► existing traffic conditions with and without implementation of the proposed projece.The effectiveness of any <br /> required noise barrier was also analyzed. <br /> Table 4.13-9 presents the predicted traffic noise levels at the property line of the existing sensitive noise receptors <br /> (residential)along the five roadway segments under existing and project conditions.Figure 4.13-2 shows the <br /> locations of sensitive receptors along the roadway segments that were the subject of the detailed analysis _ <br /> (identified by red squares and circled numbers in the figure). <br /> As shown by Table 4.13-9,the addition of College Park traffic to existing traffic volumes would not result in <br /> exceedance of the 65 dBA Ldn threshold and would not increase traffic noise by 3.0 dBA or greater at the existing <br /> noise-sensitive receptors along Byron Road,Mountain House Parkway,or the south side of Grant Line Road. In <br /> contrast, existing traffic noise levels could decrease along one or more of these roadway segments under the <br /> proposed project.Although this may seem counterintuitive, each of these roadways would be widened as part of <br /> the future roadway network under the MHMP(see Figure 4.11-11 in Section 4.11,"Transportation").This <br /> widening would distribute traffic to four rather than the existing two lanes of each of these roadways, thus <br /> decreasing existing traffic volumes in the travel lanes nearest the existing noise-sensitive receptors. See Section <br /> 4.11,"Transportation,"for further discussion. <br /> As indicated in Table 4.13-9,although the project would result in less-than-significant traffic noise impacts to <br /> existing noise-sensitive receptors along the majority of the roadway segments analyzed,project traffic would <br /> increase existing traffic noise at Receptor 14(the five existing homes on the north side of Grant Line Road, <br /> between Central Parkway and the Alameda County Line)by 3.57 dBA,from 65.54 dBA CNEL/Ld,to 69.11 dBA <br /> Ld./CNEL.This would represent a significant impact. <br /> Traffic noise impacts on existing noise-sensitive uses(impact analysis above)are determined based on existing <br /> traffic conditions with and without implementation of the proposed project.This is compared with traffic noise <br /> impacts on proposed noise-sensitive uses("Impact Analysis"under Impact 4.13-4),which are determined based <br /> on cumulative traffic conditions with and without implementation of the proposed project.Although Grant Line <br /> Village is an existing use,and thus subjected to the traffic noise analysis above,which is based on existing traffic — <br /> conditions with and without the proposed project,the residents of Grant Line Village raised concern about <br /> cumulative traffic noise impacts(i.e.,impacts of development of the College Park project combined with those of <br /> Specific Plans I and II along with other area growth)during the CEQA scoping meeting. Although cumulative <br /> noise impacts are evaluated in Chapter 6 of this Draft EIR, a detailed analysis of the cumulative traffic noise <br /> impacts on Grant Line Village is provided below in response to the comments received at the CEQA scoping <br /> meeting. <br /> 2 Traffic noise impacts on existing noise-sensitive uses are determined based on existing traffic conditions with and without _ <br /> implementation of the proposed project.This is compared with traffic noise impacts on proposed noise-sensitive uses that are determined <br /> based on cumulative traffic conditions with and without implementation of the proposed project. <br /> EDAW College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR — <br /> Noise 4.13-22 San Joaquin County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.