Laserfiche WebLink
their treated wastewater stream. At current and anticipated future rates of wastewater discharge,and given current <br /> trends, it is anticipated that the future cumulative condition regarding wastewater effluent discharge would <br /> continue to degrade water quality in the Sacramento—San Joaquin Delta(Delta).However,wastewater generated <br /> by the proposed project would be within the quantities planned for it by the MHMP, for which the Mountain <br /> House W WTP has been approved and permitted, and for which future discharges from the W WTP to Old River <br /> have been permitted(see Section 4.5,"Public Utilities"). Furthermore,because wastewater from the proposed <br /> project would be treated to tertiary levels by the W WTP,because future discharges to Old River from the plant <br /> have already been permitted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB),and <br /> because such permits are designed to avoid significant impacts on surface water quality, the proposed project <br /> would not contribute considerably to regional degradation of Delta water quality.Therefore,a less-than- <br /> significant cumulative impact would occur with respect to wastewater. <br /> Electricity and natural gas demand,regardless of energy source,will increase into the future. At current growth <br /> and usage projections,the portion of these resources based on fossil fuels will eventually(in several hundred <br /> years)run out. However,adequate electricity and natural gas infrastructure and supplies will be available to serve <br /> the project well into the future(see Section 4.5,"Public Utilities"), and when compared to the amount of <br /> electricity and natural gas consumed in the region,the proposed project would not contribute considerably to this <br /> demand.Therefore, a less-than-significant cumulative impact would occur with respect to electricity and natural <br /> gas. <br /> 6.3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> As noted in Section 4.6,"Cultural Resources,"the proposed project site lies in an area known to contain evidence of <br /> past human activity ranging from early prehistoric Native American sites to the remains of historic-era agricultural <br /> and ranching activities that were characteristic of more modem times.Other adjacent areas,as yet undeveloped and — <br /> undisturbed,likely support similar evidence of past human activity. Considerable investigative work has been <br /> completed through numerous studies ranging back to 1989.An important feature of investigations of cultural and <br /> historic resources is the determination of significance,depending on whether they are cultural or historic resources, <br /> and which could involve potential eligibility listing on national/state registers,complete preservation and protection, <br /> some form of documentation,and/or curation. <br /> Throughout the state,significant cultural and historic resources are frequently being discovered when new <br /> projects involving ground disturbance or redevelopment are proposed and evaluated. Proper investigative and <br /> documentation protocols are provided through various regulatory processes to ensure that the destruction of these <br /> valuable resources,many of which remain unknown today,is avoided.Because the proposed project would <br /> include proper investigative and documentation protocols for any cultural resources that could potentially be <br /> affected by the proposed project(as required by mitigation in Section 4.6, "Cultural Resources"),the proposed <br /> project would not contribute considerably to cumulative impacts on cultural resources,and a less-than- <br /> significant cumulative impact would occur. <br /> 6.3.6 DRAINAGE <br /> The MHMP,the Mountain House Master Drainage Plan,and the MHCIP have programmed a drainage system for <br /> the Mountain House community that has been approved and adopted.CEQA documentation for these adopted plans <br /> was prepared and demonstrated that these plans would result in less-than-significant drainage and surface water <br /> quality impacts with implementation of the policies in these plans and the mitigation measures recommended in this <br /> CEQA documentation. <br /> The MHMP contains provisions for the management of various construction and drainage control practices <br /> involving surface grading, soils, geologic and seismic hazards, storm drainage, flood flow management, erosion <br /> control, and protection of receiving-water quality. As noted in Section 4.7, "Drainage,"two main watercourses <br /> would potentially be affected by the proposed project; Old River and Mountain House Creek. Neither of the two <br /> EDAW College Park at Mountain House Spedrfic Plan III Draft EIR <br /> Cumulative Impacts 6-8 San Joaquin County <br />